Activity Stream

Can't find any judgements unless i am spelling it wrong? I have also never seen a direct funder state they are a direct lender. His website doesn't even have his CA license.

How do you know they're a broker?

You are a broker. Why aren't these guys getting banned @admin?

MCA only.

revised

There are systems that promote this on this forum, but be aware of the risks of where you are plugging your data in and what may or may not happen to it after.

I have a Check 21/22 Virtual Terminal A E-check is emailed to you within minutes for deposit You can deposit into your Bank account via a Bank Teller, ATM or Mobile Quick Account Activation Contact me for complete details

What is the some common SMS systems for computer I have only hand texted etc and still fund decent amount what is a better way?

Sign up with a ACH company like goach or your local bank but they will typically want you to be in business for 2 years or more and may not do loan brokers. Have a one page signed fee agreement, and voided check. I have a sample fee agreement I can email you. I'm signed up with US Bank under their Singlepoint so there is no fee other than a small monthly amount. I rarely do it only for loans where the lender program won't pay me a fee like SBA 7A for inventory....and I always discuss it up front with the client first and get the agreement signed up front. I don't charge any PSF for any loans where the lender pays me but that's my choice. I realize a lot of brokers do both and that's their choice.

So you issue loans, or MCAs?

Forget about the excuse he'll come up with.... I'd be more concerned with the economic and general status of the US as a whole at that point... NYC, LA, San Francisco, Chicago and every other liberal ran city is in shambles and have been for years... Lets just have Kamala, AOC and the rest of the squad come up with economic policy going forward, I'm sure that will benefit everyone who actually works for a living....

Nah

I don't know wanna put $10K on it and make your identity known?

and if he doesn't? what will the excuse be?

Over/Under on some dip posting to plug his fake funder or pack selling within next 10 comments?

Then he should appeal, which is his right to do, and I am sure his legal team will be proceeding with such.

..olderguy stop that California BS. Trump wins like it or not.

Olderguy

Jury of his peers convicted him of 34 felony counts...nothing political or fake about it. Nothing to do with prosecution or defense or fake charges. You can't argue it was illegal. He'll appeal it and that's his right. Rest is up to the courts. Nothing really to argue about. You can vote for whomever you wish if you want to change the direction of the country. We all need to move on.

Whole thing is giving off Chuck Rhodes / Bobby Axelrod vibes from the very beginning.

Arranging someone to sign a NDA is not a crime. Paying someone to not disclose they had an affair is not a crime. So what crime was he trying to cover up by listing the payment as a legal expense? That's the question the defense has been asking but the prosecution refuses to say. The judge clearly favored the prosecution, he was biased and should have recused himself. They weren't prosecuting a crime, they were prosecuting a person.

Solid way to blow a renewal.

The article ACTUALLY is for offenses involving falsification of written statements; that does not solely include business records. 11 of the charges stem from invoices for legal records. 11 of the charges stem from checks paid for legal services. 12 of the charges stem from ledger entries for legal expenses. The key decision for the jurors was to determine if Trump falsified records in an attempt to cover up the hush money payment to Stormy Daniels, AND whether that cover-up was in anticipation of committing another crime, which is an election-law violation via federal campaign crimes, tax crimes, and falsification of documents. I think you're missing the point of the trial, and what the jurors were deciding. You are also welcome to disagree with the verdict, but the fact is the burden of proof was on the prosecution, and they provided that proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This also was not a verdict that was reached quickly; the trial took 6 weeks, and the deliberation took another two or three days if I am not mistaken. Of course, if you think our entire legal system is a sham, you're welcome to make your way to Putin's homeland. I hear they welcome Trump supporters over there with open arms. Can't speak to the validity of THEIR legal system, however.

A jury of our peers would refute this, oh wait! They did.

hes only going to lose votes if he gets prison time but I sure darn hope the Republican Party gets themselves together and finds someone new. Or maybe Robert Kennedy wins by some miracle. Biden looks and acts all nice but hes got a very clear agenda and it seems like we are on a one way ticket to world war 3 with him.

This forum is moderated.