Activity Stream - DailyFunder Forums
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Activity Stream

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.
Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles Blog Blogs
  • Kevin Henry-Seacoast's Avatar
    Today, 10:02 AM
    Best advise is referring to a good tax accounting attorney that knows their industry and is local. The prospect may get advise/help because of the attorney's local connections.
    1 replies | 42 view(s) | |
  • abfunders's Avatar
    Today, 09:54 AM
    We have a lender who would like to give a merchant a loan, but they want the 2023 IRS xtension. They forgot to file for one! They're officially late (S Corp), and they were planning on filing in September, and they will just pay the fine rather than file it now, as it takes them 2 months to get everything together. What's the work-around? Can they get an extension if they were negligent in asking for one? They get the mulligan and get the fine removed if they ask nicely, but does anyone know if there's a solution here? I did put them in touch with an attorney, but maybe there's a simple fix that anyone here knows about?
    1 replies | 42 view(s)
  • diditevenfund's Avatar
    Today, 09:46 AM
    This all day long.
    12 replies | 1786 view(s) | |
  • Olderguy's Avatar
    Today, 09:35 AM
    Great suggestions: May I add that companies may know their products but most don't know how to run their business finances. Before you review and consider all these alternatives, you need a financial business plan and that's what missing with today's businesses. Business need a remote CFO to be an ongoing partner to guide them through their options. A remote CPA at $25 an hour is the best investment any company an secure. Then they aren't being pushed by some broker or another to take some financial product because it can get them quick money or make the most money for the broker which is the norm nowadays. Here: https://form.jotform.com/240650559658466 They will want to see the following: PLEASE MAKE SURE TO BRING THE FOLLOWING:: BOOKKEEPING/JOURNAL ENTRY SOFTWARE PAYROLL SOFTWARE BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT(S) – VIEW ONLY BUSINESS CREDIT CARD(S) – VIEW ONLY PERSONAL CREDIT CARD(s) – VIEW ONLY Initial consultations are free. In addition, there are other funding options available to a new business that most brokers wouldn't normally have any awareness. Personal loans 80% of gross income with a monthly payment, 3+ years, great rates Business credit card - I got a trucker $69,000 doing $11,000 a month HELOC - home equity line of credit....go to a local credit union Asset based loan....Have a truck or other asset free and clear? Hard money real estate loan - investment property....1% a month interest only fixed for 10 years. As mentioned - SBA Micro Loan - up to $50,000
    10 replies | 443 view(s) | |
  • J.Celifarco's Avatar
    Today, 08:53 AM
    PUBLIC SERVICE ANOUNCEMENT Anyone soliciting business on a post like this is who not to submit your files to
    12 replies | 1786 view(s) | |
  • Kevin Henry-Seacoast's Avatar
    Today, 07:21 AM
    Hi Davis3003, There are a lot of non-bank finance companies that might be able to help a company that is fairly new. The key to finding the right partner for the prospect is understanding their need. Typically commercial cleaning businesses struggle with working capital which is probably the issue here. The largest expense and need for working capital is likely payroll which in most cases is weekly. They likely have contracts with customers and bill for either time and materials or a fee for services monthly. When they invoice the customer the terms are net 30 at best. That being said, the prospect is floating 8 weeks of payroll before they get paid by the customer. Since out of the gate they are billing $75K/Month they are off to a great start and probably have potential to grow. Here are some thoughts on products out there: -SBA- They are great, but do not revolve to cover the consistent need. SBA loans also don't grow with the customer's needs. If they obtain a small SBA loan, what are they going to do when the funds are exhausted AND they still have to meet payroll needs. -LOC-Most banks will not consider a LOC due to time in business. Some non-banks may offer a LOC, BUT that product does not revolve to keep pace with the constant working capital need UNLESS the business consistently pays the loan down when they get paid by customers. Paying down the loan usually does NOT happen. It is also a process to get an increase on the LOC as the company grows or the loan gets tapped. -Factoring-This might be the best tool for their needs. The facility revolves around the invoicing and payments. Most factors will quickly adjust the line limit as the AR grows. This prospect would be too small for us, but you might be able to find the right partner by researching the International Factoring Association's website. Most reputable factors are members. I would research factors that are local to the company AND may be bank owned. There are over 30 bank owned factoring companies in the US and usually are MUCH more cost effective than non-banks. TIB should not be an issue. -MCA The company's gross margins are likely less than 25%. That being said, can they really afford the MCA cost. Also, MCA is truly not revolving which may stifle the growth of the company. Just some thoughts....
    10 replies | 443 view(s) | |
  • Jason Sterling's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:38 PM
    We have been consistently funding credit card sales based MCA since 2005. Our product is far better for merchants as the remittance fluctuates with their sales. We don't double dip on renewals; meaning the merchant nets the full renewal amount instead of paying the existing balance from the renewal amount. We don't charge any origination fee or other junk fees. If you want to build a long term portfolio and care about your merchants Quikstone is an excellent choice.
    12 replies | 1786 view(s) | |
  • Griffinferro's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:54 PM
    credibly
    6 replies | 527 view(s) | |
  • Olderguy's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:52 PM
    SBA has a start up micro loan program up to $50,000 https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/microloans
    10 replies | 443 view(s) | |
  • Jason Sterling's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:12 PM
    Four months in business, credit card card sales based MCA only.
    10 replies | 443 view(s) | |
  • abfunders's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:35 PM
    Fundkite does this, as do all MCAs that are credit card splits. The broker gets paid, the funder has to realize that the deal might go sideways for a bit, but there is no true default if the revenue drops. The only challenge would be the client who commits fraud and opens a second bank account and deposits certain deposits into that account and slowly depletes the other one without the funder noticing. You can probably catch that, since it's not so easy just to change bank accounts. You case is not a "default out of the gate", it's a drop in revenue. We pray underwrite assuming the past performance is indicative of future results. There's no "seasoned" merchant who can really do this. They'd have to lie to get away with it, and then prove it. How would they make it a "regular strategy" without actually losing their own revenue? That seems counterproductive to reduce their income. How could they control that?
    1 replies | 247 view(s) | |
  • JustInCase's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:08 PM
    Was thinking if a merchant is dead set on activating mandatory reconciliation clause immediately after funding how will that work? Because technically they can if deposits drop day right after according to the i's and t's of law if fully explored. Defaults do not truly exist as MCA is not a loan and risk leans on funders not merchants according to new case law. With that; #1 - If a seasoned merchant does this from the gate, how would that affect commission "PAID OUT" if at all? As old rules it is considered a "default" or "lowered-payment". Future commissions could be % like reverses I assume. #2 - If this catches on and merchants employ this as a regular strategy for savings it would basically produce denials for future funding limiting stacking which is a cure as per old system. #3 - And if no such thing as a default how will funders classify or recognize reconciliation for what it is vs default or lowered-payment? Some questions I have...
    1 replies | 247 view(s)
  • Yonah E's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:51 PM
    Mitch Petracca?
    4 replies | 236 view(s) | |
  • Ehenek's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:50 PM
    Yes. I would love to learn more.
    4 replies | 236 view(s) | |
  • Kevin Henry-Seacoast's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:50 PM
    A host of questions: -Is this an asset purchase of the business or a stock purchase of the business? -Are they seeking a cash flow loan or asset based loan using the business assets as collateral? -What Industry? -What equity contribution is the buyer contributing? -Is the seller staying with the business? Are they using a seller's note? -What is the purchase price?
    4 replies | 236 view(s) | |
  • GrowthHacker's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:33 PM
    Breaking News For All of Our Chat Bot Enthusiasts! Our chat bots have been running off of Chat GPT Turbo (which came out last November), many of you may know that that 9 days ago OpenAI released their latest version Chat GPT, which is Chat-GPT4o (basically like the news of a major theatrical sequel release to us nerds.) Great news! Our developers, just got our chatbot tech working with 4o this morning! If you're interested in learning the differences see this post: The Difference Between Chat GPT-3.5, Turbo, and the newest release Chat-GPT-4o
    9 replies | 614 view(s) | |
  • GrowthHacker's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:25 PM
    Last week OpenAI released their latest version Chat GPT, which is Chat-GPT4o. When Chat GPT was first released 18 months ago it was version 3.5, then 4, then 4-Turbo... (and lots of minor iterations in-between those massive improvements) There are some major differences between these, here's the breakdown: Speed: How fast the GPT can answer your questions. Chat GPT-4o is the fastest, followed by Chat GPT-4 Turbo, and then Chat GPT-3.5. Price: How much it costs to use GPT. Chat GPT-4o is the cheapest, followed by Chat GPT-4 Turbo, and then Chat GPT-3.5. Input Length: How many words or characters you can use when asking a question. Chat GPT-4 Turbo and Chat GPT-4o can handle really long questions (128K tokens), while Chat GPT-3.5 can only handle shorter ones (2048 tokens). Knowledge Cutoff: How up-to-date the GPT's knowledge is. All three have knowledge up to April 2023, but Chat GPT-4 Turbo and Chat GPT-4o have more recent information up to October of '23. Multimodal Capabilities: What types of media the GPT can understand and respond to. Chat GPT-4o can handle text, images, audio, and video, while Chat GPT-4 Turbo can only handle text and images. Chat GPT-3.5 can only handle text. Reasoning and Coding Intelligence: How well GPT can think and solve problems. Chat GPT-4o is the best, followed by Chat GPT-4 Turbo, and then Chat GPT-3.5. Multilingual Support: How well GPT can understand and respond to different languages. Chat GPT-4o is the best, followed by Chat GPT-4 Turbo, and then Chat GPT-3.5. Vision and Audio Understanding: How well the it can understand and interpret images and audio. Chat GPT-4o is the best, followed by Chat GPT-4 Turbo, and then Chat GPT-3.5. Response Time: How fast the robot responds to your questions. Chat GPT-4o is the fastest (average response time of 320 milliseconds, which is comparable to a human, which will be great for voice), followed by Chat GPT-4 Turbo, and then Chat GPT-3.5. Context Window: How much context it can understand when answering questions. Chat GPT-4o has the longest context window, followed by Chat GPT-4 Turbo, and then Chat GPT-3.5.
    0 replies | 79 view(s)
  • FundingCaptain's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:07 PM
    left you a voicemail
    6 replies | 492 view(s) | |
  • MCA-VET's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:08 PM
    Capybara Capital .... Email me for info ....currently one of the fastest growing funders --Focusing on the A-Minus-To-C+Paper..with ability to compete on length and $-Amounts! and lower factor/Buy-Rate to win ---Dolphins & Whales is what we are known for by the largest brokerage shops who sub to Capybara daily!
    2 replies | 149 view(s) | |
  • abfunders's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:04 PM
    If it was a restaurant, I just got an offer for a $250k 1.45 over 24 months line of credit and was competing with a $100k 1.35 over 16 months MCA. Happy to make the introductions, please send me an email mmarkowitz@abfunders.com
    6 replies | 492 view(s) | |
  • Olderguy's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:45 AM
    Reach out..I can do 90% LTV loan.
    4 replies | 236 view(s) | |
  • bizfinanceUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:43 AM
    Can anyone point me to an investor or lender that may do these type of high end loans..
    4 replies | 236 view(s)
  • Clark Sica's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:00 AM
    Lending Valley can take a look at it. We'd require 100k minimum gross along with 4 trucks and 4 drivers to issue an approval. Let's touch base and discuss this in more detail before you submit
    6 replies | 492 view(s) | |
  • bsilva434's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:56 AM
    Unfortunately, most of the top tier lenders in the industry are putting out offers on the higher end of their rate threshold due to the current economic climate. Rates are high across the board and those higher rates are passed down to lenders from their credit facilities. I see a lot of A paper lenders come back with sell rates close to 1.50 for their 18 month product. Anyone who has been in this industry for any amount of time knows that if a business is in a cash flow pinch that it will be much more beneficial for them to pay a higher rate (closer to 1.50) for an 18 month program as opposed to anything in the 1.30 - 1.40 range that would most certainly cap out at 12 months. The lower payment is what will ultimately help this client the most. It does seem like you have had a few declines for this merchant at other shops. I would like to say that we may be able to come in at a lower rate for an 18 month cost, but I would certainly need more information. Also, how many points are built into that 1.54 offer?
    11 replies | 2060 view(s) | |
  • fundinggrasshopper's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:55 AM
    agreed if their credit supports a personal it is definitely the better route.
    10 replies | 443 view(s) | |
  • fundinggrasshopper's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:54 AM
    East Shore, Cooper Asset, Greenbox Capital,
    10 replies | 443 view(s) | |
  • Yankeeman07's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:53 AM
    UCC = Zero
    1 replies | 263 view(s) | |
  • SendDocsPlox's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:18 AM
    Having a debate with someone Without any context: What percentage of your leads are UCCs? If you don't want to answer that question: Are UCCs part of your lead lists on a regular basis? Burners welcome, given the circumstances
    1 replies | 263 view(s)
  • FundingCaptain's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:17 AM
    I can help. even with 5 months in business, I can get him on my platform and give him our add-on renewals that work like a line of credit to help them not have to stack and put the business in further risk...call or email me
    10 replies | 443 view(s) | |
  • MNY Capital's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:10 AM
    We fund trucking - 2nd+ Email me - Jacob@mnycapital.com
    6 replies | 492 view(s) | |
More Activity


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

FundKite survey finds 77%
Ocrolus / Dragin partner
Broker Fair beats out deBanked MIAMI


DIRECTORY