[cruisinman]

well its specifically stated in many ISO agreements that the relationship is the funders, so technically its theirs in those agreements. been that way for years

ISO's need to negotiate that clause out of their Agreements. Unless the Funder is supplying the leads to the ISO that led to the Deal(s).

[Bcooper]

ISO's need to negotiate that clause out of their Agreements. Unless the Funder is supplying the leads to the ISO that led to the Deal(s).

you really have no idea how this industry works

[cruisinman]

you really have no idea how this industry works

Precisely why we will be disrupters . . .

Legal Agreements are Legal Agreements. Doesn't matter what "Industry" it is . . .

[Bcooper]

Precisely why we will be disrupters . . .

Legal Agreements are Legal Agreements. Doesn't matter what "Industry" it is . . .

the only thing you will be disrupting is your retirement. this industry doesnt work in person, we tried to warn you

[cruisinman]

lol no Funder is gonna red-line their ISO agreement for you, or any beginner.

You would be surprised . . .

They don't want you to move the deals you bring them.

Then it behooves them to take care of us.

its a referral agreement, not your client. so only weak, desperate funders would agree to take that out of their ISO agreement with you.

Unless the Funder provided the lead for said Client, the Client belongs to our Network and the Broker that brought them in. The Broker, has exclusive rights to said Client, provided that the Broker has an active Agreement with our Network and they are in good standing.

. . . knowing their deals are put in jeopardy given your lack of knowledge . . .

Funding Deals isn't rocket science. Additionally, our inhouse Manager + the Funder ISO Manager should be able to tell prior to funding if the Deal could be jeopardized.

. . . your willingness to already luc 1.49s at 6mths as an mlm biz model . . .

Nothing wrong with 1.49's over 6 months if the Client qualifies for it. MLM bix model isn't evil. It allows Brokers to leverage their time and resources to create additional income.

. . . and overall motor mouth without action.

LOL - you haven't a clue what actions we will be capable of Josh . . .

You seem to be just another keyboard warrior like Bcooper.

[Bcooper]

You would be surprised . . .



Then it behooves them to take care of us.



Unless the Funder provided the lead for said Client, the Client belongs to our Network and the Broker that brought them in. The Broker, has exclusive rights to said Client, provided that the Broker has an active Agreement with our Network and they are in good standing.



Funding Deals isn't rocket science. Additionally, our inhouse Manager + the Funder ISO Manager should be able to tell prior to funding if the Deal could be jeopardized.



Nothing wrong with 1.49's over 6 months if the Client qualifies for it. MLM bix model isn't evil. It allows Brokers to leverage their time and resources to create additional income.



LOL - you haven't a clue what actions we will be capable of Josh . . .

You seem to be just another keyboard warrior like Bcooper.

I'm not a keyboard warrior I'm just pointing out the truth your mlm won't work

[Bcooper]

lol buddy, I've been in this business for years. I'm stating fact about who owns the relationship in most agreements but yet you want to argue even though you haven't read 5 ISO agreements.
Id laugh at a broker like you if they asked to redline an agreement. only time funders even discuss that is high volume producing ISOs, and you dream of that, come back when you have even 10 brokers working for you.
1.49s at 6 mths and worse deals are why there are new laws for APR disclosures and more regulations and crackdown. You can pretend all you want that its ok because a merchant accepted it, but all you offer is talk about what you are going to do and not actually doing it. no 'disruptor' tells the whole world what they are doing before anything is accomplished.

how long do you give it before he ends up in the news because of a fed crack down?