[SydCapital]

definitely a need for a micro loan out there. Not sure what a guy will gain by stealing a a loan that size . most of my reps wont even bother bringing in anyone doing less then 10-15k .
syd
how fast can you fund and do you have doc you sign?

We can fund within 24 hours. On some files we require a COJ (original) but will fund in transit. And yes, we do have DocuSign for the contracts (excluding COJ).

[Michael I]

We can fund within 24 hours. On some files we require a COJ (original) but will fund in transit. And yes, we do have DocuSign for the contracts (excluding COJ).

yeah there is the deal killer for me .to much headache to make $120

[mcaguru]

Guys,

This aggression will NOT stand. - The Dude. (or Duder).

[WestCoastFunding]

I love the explainer you provide on the products you offer on the front page introduction:


"LARGE DEALS
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipis elit. Suspendisse venenatis mi et risus fringilla, sit amet posuere rhoncus." - http://sydcapital.com/

Very informative.

[ADiamond]

We just closed a round of financing that has been allocated for micro deals ($1,500 - $5,000 funded)

Any industry, any position, any credit score

Minimum 3 months TIB, $5K average deposit volume

8% commission across the board (initial/renewal)

Syndication available up to 100%

Call or email for more information or for an ISO agreement

Sydney Capital Fund LP | Syd Capital
7950 NW 53rd Street
Miami, Florida 33166
T (305) 414-1988 | info@sydcapital.com

are you taking outside syndication on these micro deals? private message please

[HDF]

WELL SAID^

Syd may very well be a great guy, but you really need to get your act together for everyone's sake. As an industry, all of us need to step it up a bit.

[mcaguru]

At least you guys are honest and not looking to hurt this funder. I bet you at some shop somewhere in America the head of sales just got out the Megaphone and pleaded with the reps to get any deal that seems bad over to these guys before they smarten up..( i am not saying this funder will fool for it).

[WestCoastFunding]

Very well said.

This guy is asking people to send over their clients' personal information (including SS#) and business bank statements, but doesn't want to ease people's concerns that he's not legit. And when people ask basic commonsense questions, he gets defensive. Defensiveness is generally a good sign that someone is trying to hide something. All the other funders on this forum have no problems answering any of these questions.

But when you combine lack of SOS registration, lack of internet footprint, a single page website written in "Ipsum Lorem" and outright anger at people attempting to vet your company, people are going to be highly-skeptical.

If this is the public face of your customer service and ISO outreach, one can only imagine the hell one would have to go through working with you.

[mcaguru]

the only question anyone would be OK asking would be a First and Last name,

[mcaguru]

With all said...There is a great chance that if you met these folks you would not have posted any of the above.

[HDF]

With all said...There is a great chance that if you met these folks you would not have posted any of the above.

Exactly true. But it also isn't surprising that you support his lack of professionalism.

[mcaguru]

Exactly true. But it also isn't surprising that you support his lack of professionalism.

That's because i don't confuse professionalism and success.

I know a few guys worth deep in the 9 digits that have/had (sold) extremely large companies that i can assure you have products that they created that when you look at their shirts you know what they ate for lunch!

[SydCapital]

Thank you all for the public feedback and the private messages/emails. We look forward to working with anyone who is interested in our programs.

We are also willing to provide, privately, any additional information or documentation necessary to substantiate the legitimacy of our operation, once we have an ISO agreement in place and the provisions of confidentiality and non-disclosure are mutually agreed to. We do not expect anybody to send us a submission unless and until they have fully vetted us and are comfortable with moving forward.

We understand the many justified reasons for skepticism in this space, and we will ensure that our company provides transparency to our partners. The operative word here is "partners" - we are not going to open up our books in a public forum. We look forward to building strong, profitable relationships many new partners in the coming months.

In short, you might not like our website, you might question whether we are non-compliant with statutory filing requirements (we are not), and you might have any number of other questions or concerns about our company. We'll do our best to provide you with the answers you are looking for, but there's a limit to how much we can (or should be expected to) publish publicly.

[CreditGuy]

We are well aware of what the legal requirements are for our company, and I assure you we're in full compliance thereof.

you might question whether we are compliant with statutory filing requirements (we are not)

I'll just leave this here.

[SydCapital]

I'll just leave this here.

I meant non-compliant, which we are not. We are compliant.

[NoBigDeal]

I'll just leave this here.

this is fake news. If you look above, that's not what the original post said

[TedFundy]

^^^ ..........yeahhhhhh about that........... ^^^

[WestCoastFunding]

"We are also willing to provide, privately, any additional information or documentation necessary to substantiate the legitimacy of our operation, once we have an ISO agreement in place"

Provide information relating to your company's legitimacy AFTER an ISO agreement is in place?

That's not supposed to be how this works.

[FCG]

The falcons blew a 28-3 lead

[HDF]

That's because i don't confuse professionalism and success.

Yes, that is very apparent, Guru.

[mcaguru]

That's because i don't confuse professionalism and success.

Yes, that is very apparent, Guru.

[WestCoastFunding]

We expect funders to thoroughly vet borrowers to make sure they're legit. Many funders will -- rightfully -- vet ISOs. As a broker myself I've learned to vet my ISOs. So why wouldn't we expect ISOs to vet people claiming to be direct funders? We owe it to our clients to vet funders. Just send in people's personal and business information/documents to unknown, unvetted entities who'se only internet footprint is a post on a message board?

Even more, what's this person's name? All the other funders will provide name and contact information. This guy won't tell us his first and last name (unless his actual name is Syd Capital).

It's in everyone's interest in this industry to make sure that we reduce/eliminate exposure of clients info to fraud. Therefore, it's in everyone's interest to make sure funders are vetted, so as to avoid stories that will hurt the industry.

[Fundyman]

eyo...... Can't we ALLL JUS GET ALONG??????



(I just HAD to do it cause I'm so late catching up on this tonight...)

[WestCoastFunding]

We understand the many justified reasons for skepticism in this space, and we withere's a limit to how much we can (or should be expected to) publish publicly.

Right! How dare anyone ask what your ACTUAL NAME is, while you ask others to send their clients' sensitive personal and business financial information.

Sounds legit.

[RickyR3712]

It is such a shame as a real micro deal funder is needed . Meaning someone with good credit and just low volume to get a normal 6 month type deal(not 1.50 2 months) and fund in a day with minimal stips. Loan me used to be that lender but now they really only approve higher volume.