Quote Originally Posted by jbrown View Post
To clarify Sean's comments, we withdrew one of our stacking lawsuits because we could not get the documentation necessary to prove the impact of the stacking loans on the merchant's cash flow. The merchant was out of business and gone, we believe because of the stacker's actions, and we couldn't get bank statements etc. necessary to move forward.

We have another case moving forward against Pearl in Maryland. The court's opinion, in denying Pearl's motion to dismiss, was supportive of our claim and that tortious interference is a valid course of action.
Please keep us updated on this as it moves forward.