[Funder Mark]

I am with Zach on this one. If I have a client who defaulted on me, and says they need more money and will pay me back, if WBL is aware of the default, why would that be considered unethical? Maybe WBL can set things up that a minimum % of their funding has to go to pay back other funders, but that is a separate issue.

[AlexSMF]

I am with Zach on this one. If I have a client who defaulted on me, and says they need more money and will pay me back, if WBL is aware of the default, why would that be considered unethical? Maybe WBL can set things up that a minimum % of their funding has to go to pay back other funders, but that is a separate issue.

I do not see anything unethical here. Giving merchant an additional position who is already barely keeping up with existing payments...maybe, but not this.