Yellowstone changing exclusivity from 14 days to none? Anyone hear that? - Page 2
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 47 of 47
  1. #26
    Senior Member Reputation points: 23718
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,746

    Quote Originally Posted by AlexSMF View Post
    No, but if you love losing deals to funders you submit to then give swift a call
    Yep, they have been known to make deals disappear. I hardly ever name names, but I've personally witnessed it.

  2. #27
    Senior Member Reputation points: 13820
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    200

    Well then...there's a lot of drama going on in here. All I can say is we respect our ISOs and exclusivity periods are only fair.

  3. #28
    Senior Member Reputation points: 10944
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,203

    Quote Originally Posted by kpeng View Post
    Well then...there's a lot of drama going on in here. All I can say is we respect our ISOs and exclusivity periods are only fair.
    What makes an exclusivity fair?
    Im actually interested to hear an argument for exclusivity periods as I was one of the few people to oppose the removal.

  4. #29
    Senior Member Reputation points: 23718
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,746

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyYSCISOdept View Post
    What makes an exclusivity fair?
    Im actually interested to hear an argument for exclusivity periods as I was one of the few people to oppose the removal.
    It's not fair. Why should an ISO putting 15 points into a deal and trying to collect some BS 3rd party origination fee hold your client hostage when you are willing to do the deal for 8 points and no junk fees for example? Survival of the fittest and the first one to the finish line should win the deal.

  5. #30
    Senior Member Reputation points: 10944
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,203

    Quote Originally Posted by FUNd View Post
    It's not fair. Why should an ISO putting 15 points into a deal and trying to collect some BS 3rd party origination fee hold your client hostage when you are willing to do the deal for 8 points and no junk fees for example? Survival of the fittest and the first one to the finish line should win the deal.
    I agree with you. However, as I am a simple servant of the people I have to do what they asked and I received a resounding cry of opposition to the removal. However, I do suspect, like a lot of others, that this was simply a way to lock up a deal for 2 weeks at YSC while they shop it elsewhere knowing that they have a fall back plan. This is actually really unfair to the admins, underwriters, and staff who do their work with the full belief that the deal will come back.

  6. #31
    Senior Member Reputation points: 43599 brokerCompany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    CALIFORNIA
    Posts
    947

    exclusivity periods are fair. YOU are not holding a merchant hostage, they have the option to go to a different funder or different broker to get money.
    Makes things real shady when the funder opens your deal to anyone.
    To many stories and experiences of funders taking your deal away or somehow it got "mixed up" in the process..
    I will only work with funders who have exclusivity period.

  7. #32
    Veteran Reputation points: 159120 J.Celifarco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,509

    Quote Originally Posted by brokerCompany View Post
    exclusivity periods are fair. YOU are not holding a merchant hostage, they have the option to go to a different funder or different broker to get money.
    Makes things real shady when the funder opens your deal to anyone.
    To many stories and experiences of funders taking your deal away or somehow it got "mixed up" in the process..
    I will only work with funders who have exclusivity period.
    I have to disagree here, I hate when I submit a deal to a bank and they say already received y someone else and cant work it. I will take my chances competing with another iso on a fair playing field where we are both working with the same buy rates.. The better closer wins.

    I don't understand why everyone thinks the banks are the ones doing shady stuff in these open competition situations. They have so much business coming in that I have a hard time believing they would ruin their reputation to take a deal from one iso to give to another. If you believe a bank you a re working with would do this then the problem is not their competition policy the problem is the fact that you don't trust the bank.. If you don't trust a bank don't work with them because of that not because of the competition on a deal
    John Celifarco
    Managing Partner
    Horizon Funding Group

    3423 Ave S
    Brooklyn, NY 11234
    T: (347) 773-3990 | F: (718) 795-1990
    Linkedin: Profile
    Email: john@horizonfundinggroup.com

  8. #33
    Senior Member Reputation points: 307559
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,326

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyYSCISOdept View Post
    What makes an exclusivity fair?
    Im actually interested to hear an argument for exclusivity periods as I was one of the few people to oppose the removal.
    once submitted by iso, in house can not submit for 7 days and vice versa ( iso gets previously received if already in house ) . iso to iso no exclusivity and may the best man win . (it will be nice to updated that multiple people submitted it

  9. #34
    Senior Member Reputation points: 23718
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,746

    Quote Originally Posted by brokerCompany View Post
    they have the option to go to a different funder or different broker to get money.
    When they end up at YSC, this statement does not always hold true.

  10. #35
    Senior Member Reputation points: 10944
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,203

    Quote Originally Posted by FUNd View Post
    When they end up at YSC, this statement does not always hold true.
    Strongly disagree, they always have the option, doesn't mean they'll get apprvoved LOL

  11. #36
    Senior Member Reputation points: 43599 brokerCompany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    CALIFORNIA
    Posts
    947

    It has happened where YS has said they already have the file in house. Fine I take the deal elsewhere beat their rates and get it funded.
    You are on the same playing field. If another ISO has your deal take it to a funder that beats their rates don't take it to the same funder! Guy with better sources and closing skill wins.
    And yes a funder will screw a little broker out of a deal. So yeah I don't work with them, there is enough new isos to take their business
    Standard practice for many funders in this space.



    Quote Originally Posted by J.Celifarco View Post
    I have to disagree here, I hate when I submit a deal to a bank and they say already received y someone else and cant work it. I will take my chances competing with another iso on a fair playing field where we are both working with the same buy rates.. The better closer wins.

    I don't understand why everyone thinks the banks are the ones doing shady stuff in these open competition situations. They have so much business coming in that I have a hard time believing they would ruin their reputation to take a deal from one iso to give to another. If you believe a bank you a re working with would do this then the problem is not their competition policy the problem is the fact that you don't trust the bank.. If you don't trust a bank don't work with them because of that not because of the competition on a deal

  12. #37
    Senior Member Reputation points: 307559
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,326

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyYSCISOdept View Post
    I agree with you. However, as I am a simple servant of the people I have to do what they asked and I received a resounding cry of opposition to the removal. However, I do suspect, like a lot of others, that this was simply a way to lock up a deal for 2 weeks at YSC while they shop it elsewhere knowing that they have a fall back plan. This is actually really unfair to the admins, underwriters, and staff who do their work with the full belief that the deal will come back.
    why do you keep iso like that ?

  13. #38
    Senior Member Reputation points: 43599 brokerCompany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    CALIFORNIA
    Posts
    947

    YSC is not the end all for low grade paper. Just had you guys approve a merchant for 10k another of my funders got him funded for 50k.
    Don't hold your merchant hostage thinking ys is the only option LOL

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyYSCISOdept View Post
    Strongly disagree, they always have the option, doesn't mean they'll get apprvoved LOL

  14. #39
    Veteran Reputation points: 159120 J.Celifarco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,509

    Quote Originally Posted by brokerCompany View Post
    It has happened where YS has said they already have the file in house. Fine I take the deal elsewhere beat their rates and get it funded.
    You are on the same playing field. If another ISO has your deal take it to a funder that beats their rates don't take it to the same funder! Guy with better sources and closing skill wins.
    And yes a funder will screw a little broker out of a deal. So yeah I don't work with them, there is enough new isos to take their business
    Standard practice for many funders in this space.
    I dont think there is a standard practice I think all banks differ. Personally, I like 1st contract in, I will put my closing skills up against anyone and be confident that I can get it done. If I dont then I dont deserve the deal.
    I will also disagree that banks will take deals from smaller ISO's. If a bank will do that then they have no business in this space and nobody should submit to them. I am not saying it doesn't happen, what I am saying is if it does happen then let everyone know it happened and stop working with them. Having spent enough time on this forum and listening to different people say that "ABC" bank stole my deal, what usually happens is once all the facts come out more often then not they did not steal the deal. If banks are stealing deals and you have proof let everyone know and you will see these bad banks go away because nobody will submit to them. I think what happens more often then not is a bank has a 1st contract in policy, an ISO loses the deal to another ISO, and they scream foul because they cant imagine that they lost a deal. Every time you lose a deal its not the banks fault sometimes you just lose. Sometimes you lose I know it has happened to me, when it happens dont complain about the banks policy, get angry and make sure you dont lose the next one
    John Celifarco
    Managing Partner
    Horizon Funding Group

    3423 Ave S
    Brooklyn, NY 11234
    T: (347) 773-3990 | F: (718) 795-1990
    Linkedin: Profile
    Email: john@horizonfundinggroup.com

  15. #40
    Senior Member Reputation points: 10944
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,203

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael I View Post
    why do you keep iso like that ?
    Why not. At the end of the day we are a funder and funders fund the deals they get. I cant prove unequivocally that that's whats going on but Ive done a little litmus test and found that it has happened in the past.

    And no, YS is not the end all for deals that are tough to get done but a lot of people would not fund nearly as much business without us, and there is no disputing that.

  16. #41
    Senior Member Reputation points: 1322
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    195

    I cant wait for this new rule to come into effect at Yellowstone. Since literally every iso under the sun sends every high risk deal there its very hard to get it through and work the file. I cant wait to compete on those deals that were previously kicked back to me, may the best man win!!!

  17. #42
    Senior Member Reputation points: 43599 brokerCompany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    CALIFORNIA
    Posts
    947

    great 10 brokers working on the same deal with YSC. I wonder if they will all get the same pricing??

  18. #43
    Senior Member Reputation points: 2697
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    189

    Yellowstone changing exclusivity from 14 days to none? Anyone hear that?

    This should help ISOs focus on selling the approvals they have and not shop the deal with 3 other lenders or charge excessive upfront fees. Now is when the game starts!!!!

  19. #44
    Veteran Reputation points: 159120 J.Celifarco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,509

    Quote Originally Posted by brokerCompany View Post
    great 10 brokers working on the same deal with YSC. I wonder if they will all get the same pricing??
    that is a good question.. Andy, do you know how this will work, if a deal is in competition will any iso's working on it be working with the same offers???
    John Celifarco
    Managing Partner
    Horizon Funding Group

    3423 Ave S
    Brooklyn, NY 11234
    T: (347) 773-3990 | F: (718) 795-1990
    Linkedin: Profile
    Email: john@horizonfundinggroup.com

  20. #45
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    the answer would/will be NO. Depending on what in house funder you are using,t he pricing and commission changes

  21. #46
    Senior Member Reputation points: 10944
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,203

    Absolutely, the only thing I would say, is this really favors the ISO reps at YSC that have a little juice with underwriting to help their guys get the best offer possible. Now that's not in anyway saying that Im the only one with Juice but you can call me "Kool Aid"

  22. #47
    Senior Member Reputation points: 10944
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    1,203

    Quote Originally Posted by Chambo View Post
    the answer would/will be NO. Depending on what in house funder you are using,t he pricing and commission changes
    Right, but one funder isn't giving one guy one offer and another a different one which is the way you just made it sound. Knowing which underwriter to go to is our job as ISO reps.

Similar Threads

  1. anybody hear of superior Captial fund?
    By John Galt in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-26-2017, 07:54 PM
  2. Anyone hear of 1stMerchantFunding.com ?
    By EDP in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-10-2016, 12:36 PM
  3. Don't waste five days with IOU
    By fundgorilla in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-03-2015, 11:14 PM
  4. CAN doing away with PreQual Exclusivity
    By 1StopFunding in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-03-2014, 09:43 PM
  5. Syndication Changing in MCA
    By Capital Stack in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-25-2013, 10:33 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

Blue Owl Capital acquires Atalaya
Kansas added to disclosure service tool
FIS launches SMB digital lending


DIRECTORY