[Karen37a]

This again comes down to "tortious interference"

Courts in the past have made a distinct difference between legitimate competition and unlawful
interference.

These cases have been going on with loans...commercial lending for decades. 1st position, 2nd position.

Most just had to prove they have a "lawful business interest"...certain jurisdictions have specific laws

The Lender had to establish that they had a legitimate business purpose, not malice or “disinterested malevolence" which technically is an evil purposeful intent to harm.

they have used this as a weapon to stop the seconds( loans) but Ive seen it be "summarily dismissed"

Ive also seen someone come back with a malicious prosecution defense off of a baseless claim


( My experience is with commercial and residential lending in regards to these matters , not mcas)


*not legal advice just past observation