[Karen37a]

I am tired of this tortious interference argument. I am not a lawyer BUT I do Believe that in order to assert the tortious interference claim, a few things would have to have happened.

You had an agreement/contract with a company and you are driving business away to a competitor behind their back..even if its for stacking purposes or

You make false claims and accusations are made against a business or an individual's reputation in order to drive business away.

or When an individual uses "tort" (a wrongful act) to come between two parties' mutual contract. ( slander, defamation, scare tactics, racketeering)

There is a fine line as to what is a tortious act... Sprint cannot sue Metro pcs for having customers switch to them , or take out a second phone.
Well I take that back..anyone can sue for anything.

Their is something called frivolous damage. If someone was ever to do that to me and I did not enter into a contractual agreement with them to stay "loyal". Id slap them back with a frivolous damage suit and malicious prosecution.
This "in my opinion" is a used as a scare tactic from bullies trying to keep their clients, or some personal vendetta. Or maybe good companies trying to get other companies from over extending clients and bankrupting them...who knows

I do not stack my loans and preach against it to clients...doesn't stop them from going behind my back to another company.

Can I claim tortious interference as well? What if my renewals get taken?

I try to establish a good working relationship with my clients, and that's the only thing that's going to keep most of them loyal to me.