[Funder Mark]

If you agree, please say yes.

[anonymous]

Yes.

[TheShitzuofMCA]

yes! ...I dont know if my baby will have enough to eat tonite but Kanye is getting richer thanks to YuliaG.

[anonymous]

That's pretty heavy. We just want to get rid of Yulia man, all Kanye-related issues aside.

[TheShitzuofMCA]

lol I hope the baby not eating wasn't too much. He could skip a few meals honestly.

[HDF]

Yes. Don't let the Dior hit you in the ass.

[cpnbizdev]

yes

[Oxforddan]

Yes

[Michael I]

yes

[J.Celifarco]

yes

[bdshaw]

yes

[Triton]

yes

[rick_clsfunding]

This is starting to sound a lot like the new “Twitter Trust and Safety Council” ...seems like a board ready to censor comments in deference to political correctness.

Who cares? Just use the forum's "Ignore" feature...

[Funder Mark]

This is starting to sound a lot like the new “Twitter Trust and Safety Council” ...seems like a board ready to censor comments in deference to political correctness.

Who cares? Just use forum's the "Ignore" feature...

I am a conservative Republican, and I cant stand Trump, but that is besides the point. If you look at YuliyaG's posts, everyone disagrees with whatever she says, and nobody feels she is a constructive member of Daily Funder. THAT is why we want her off, because she has nothing beneficial to add here.

[PC Cooper]

I am a conservative Republican, and I cant stand Trump, but that is besides the point. If you look at YuliyaG's posts, everyone disagrees with whatever she says, and nobody feels she is a constructive member of Daily Funder. THAT is why we want her off, because she has nothing beneficial to add here.

This is just my take, but isn't moving to ban someone on what they are saying tantamount to censorship and forced compliance? "Say what we want or else?" Even if the posts that are business related are all loathed, this cannot be reason to preclude her from commenting. By doing so it becomes more than a simple opinion even if shared by the masses. It becomes censorship at it's worst and the start of a very slippery slope.

What if next time one of us are targeted simply based upon our thoughts? Who also decides what is "beneficial" to this forum? One man's trash is another's treasure after all.

The fact that she backs Trump or the fact that she may issue posts which some or all find pointless is not a valid reason. I firmly feel that the internet, this post included, can be a Petri dish for the old adage of "conform or else". I'm not saying I agree with anything she has said, but the dangerous purpose and undertones of this thread is concerning. Again, this is just my take and no offense or comment is targeted to anyone in particular.

[Funder Mark]

This is just my take, but isn't moving to ban someone on what they are saying tantamount to censorship and forced compliance? "Say what we want or else?" Even if the posts that are business related are all loathed, this cannot be reason to preclude her from commenting. By doing so it becomes more than a simple opinion even if shared by the masses. It becomes censorship at it's worst and the start of a very slippery slope.

What if next time one of us are targeted simply based upon our thoughts? Who also decides what is "beneficial" to this forum? One man's trash is another's treasure after all.

The fact that she backs Trump or the fact that she may issue posts which some or all find pointless is not a valid reason. I firmly feel that the internet, this post included, can be a Petri dish for the old adage of "conform or else". I'm not saying I agree with anything she has said, but the dangerous purpose and undertones of this thread is concerning. Again, this is just my take and no offense or comment is targeted to anyone in particular.

I was not suggesting she be banned because people disagree with her. I have said things that other people have disagreed with. But when someone is widely held to be full of s**t, posts about things that have zero relevance to the industry like 'Yeezy Money', and is believed to be a front for someone who is banned on the website, THAT is who I suggested be banned.

[PC Cooper]

I was not suggesting she be banned because people disagree with her. I have said things that other people have disagreed with. But when someone is widely held to be full of s**t, posts about things that have zero relevance to the industry like 'Yeezy Money', and is believed to be a front for someone who is banned on the website, THAT is who I suggested be banned.

I was unaware of the mitigating circumstances...so I do see your point especially if a front for someone who is already banned.

[YuliyaG]

This is starting to sound a lot like the new “Twitter Trust and Safety Council” ...seems like a board ready to censor comments in deference to political correctness.

Who cares? Just use forum's the "Ignore" feature...

The ignore feature works great. But guys like to express their feelings and emotions. They have an emotion after reading this stuff and feel the need to express them. It must be therapeutic.

You won't get someone to come up with one logical reason why clicking ignore is not an ideal solution. Guys are into their feelings so the emotion / feeling of satisfaction is much greater if there is a ban vs. their just clicking ignore.

Maybe that's why folks are asking for bans. Because when done, they'll get to feel an enorphin Rush greater than the one they'd get if they were clicking ignore.

Emotions dominate decision making in this space like no other so it all adds up.

[Triton]

This is starting to sound a lot like the new “Twitter Trust and Safety Council” ...seems like a board ready to censor comments in deference to political correctness.

Who cares? Just use forum's the "Ignore" feature...

Where exactly is this ignore feature? Can't seem to find it.

[Hedley Lamarr]

Where exactly is this ignore feature? Can't seem to find it.

Click on a user's name in a tread and it will pull up their profile. The ignore feature is in the tabs to the left.

[Funder Mark]

I just did it on her.

[Triton]

that worked well.

Thanks!

[WhoisKingsley]

If only everything in life had an "ignore" button

[J.Celifarco]

If only everything in life had an "ignore" button

now this is an idea I could get behind

[AlexSMF]

Unless someone on here is doing something illegal or taking advantage of others by lying or misrepresenting themselves, then I do not see why they should be banned. If you don't like what someone has to say, just don't read their posts or ignore them. Just my 2 cents.