Results 1 to 25 of 143
Threaded View
-
02-03-2016, 05:04 PM #11
Reputation points: 99426
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 1,780
The penalty just applies to the merchant. He can be ruled in default and the 1st position funder can try to collect the full balance owed. But we all know that would never happen because that action would really put the merchant in default. So the 1st funder is really powerless to do anything but let the merchant continue to pay him back and hope he doesn't default from the weight of the stacks.
The real question is can the 1st funder sue the stacking company for tortious interference if there is a default? That's the gray area. The stacker can say that they have nothing to do with the merchant's contract with the 1st funder and there isn't a non-compete agreement in place between the two organizations so there's really no basis for a lawsuit.Last edited by MCNetwork; 02-03-2016 at 05:19 PM.
Similar Threads
-
Wall Funding Is Getting Your Deals Funded!
By iso@wallfunding in forum PromotionsReplies: 0Last Post: 11-25-2015, 11:54 AM -
Wall Funding Is Expanding, Looking For New ISO's To Join The Success!
By iso@wallfunding in forum PromotionsReplies: 0Last Post: 11-12-2015, 01:03 PM -
Wall Street/ Wall Funding
By Drizzle in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 15Last Post: 02-17-2015, 01:36 PM -
Favorite site
By 1StopFunding in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 7Last Post: 06-20-2014, 06:03 PM