Results 1 to 25 of 53
Threaded View
-
01-04-2016, 01:06 PM #9
Reputation points: 16720
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Posts
- 430
Wire fraud. It won't be a DA, it will be an ambitious AUSA given it will be interstate commerce. They will do it to make an example of the industry.
There are so many shady things going on in this space, not just the disclosed junk fees. We see altered contracts all the time. The ISO has the borrower sign one version of the loan docs and then submits a second version with a higher rate to the funder with a forged signature from the first. Or, they lift the ACH info from the funder's contracts and use it to debit the merchants account for a undisclosed junk fee. I've also seen ISOs sign contracts on the borrower's behalf, let the loan fund, and then ACH the proceeds. Once the debits start rolling in the merchants call us and say they never signed a thing.
Those are just the one's that really only impact the merchant. I've also seen plenty of ISOs pull all manner of shenanigans on lender's they work with, like stacking multiple advances at closing from different funders, or stacking their own second funded partially with the commission paid by the funder.
I've seen almost every gimmick you can imagine, and there are probably some I can't imagine that I'm yet to see.
Similar Threads
-
Charging a Professional Service Fee (with lenders who allow it ofc)
By WhiteHorse in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 0Last Post: 05-13-2015, 07:41 PM -
12 Months...1.18....No Fees
By thudson in forum PromotionsReplies: 0Last Post: 04-30-2015, 11:12 AM -
Charging for leads after the sale
By Project Starter in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 4Last Post: 09-03-2014, 02:19 AM -
Merchant Cash Group offering to pay fees instead of charging them!
By HeatherF in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 3Last Post: 02-26-2013, 02:36 PM