Results 1 to 20 of 20
Hybrid View
-
12-16-2015, 10:09 AM #1
Interesting Situation
I got a deal that has a funny story. In August this client got funded from OnDeck, and for each of the last 4 months they have had more withdrawals then actual deposits. The client was approved by one of the B paper guys for $32k with a 1.32 for a 2nd, but declined by one of the D paper funders. Its a funny situation I personally have not seen before. Now I can see why the D company declined the deal, but how did the B company give that offer? It is a solid one with a signed contract already. To me its funny how different companies have entirely different underwriting ideas. Do any of the respected, knowledgeable members of the forum have any ideas how this happened?
-
12-16-2015, 10:15 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
- Posts
- 1,746
I'm neither respected nor knowledgeable, but with the info provided I would guess the industry would have something to with it. Some B lenders love home-based construction or transportation for example, while some D guys are deathly afraid of it. Just a guess obviously since you didn't mention the industry but has happened to me multiple times.
-
12-16-2015, 10:16 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 3,326
yes very easy . Most d paper look at the last 3-4 months only so if they are low then nothing to do . B lenders will look at the whole year and take that average to fund .
also mark side note ,signed contracts mean nothing .
-
12-16-2015, 10:18 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
- Posts
- 1,746
-
12-16-2015, 11:25 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 3,326
The ones smarter than the average bear . i had a restaurant which is not a seasonal business generally, doing way better in payback months . Now 2 ways you can look at it . either they are doing worse so decline or they are seasonal . Your job is to know which lender will think which way .
-
12-16-2015, 12:50 PM #6
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
- Posts
- 1,202
Sorry Zach. 8 months, 12 months in business
I sent you a PM recently about something else we should talk about...
-
12-16-2015, 10:23 AM #7
Not seasonal, credit is good, has years left on business location lease, nice industry. I guess the idea is that different funders have different terms, and go out to different lengths. If the B guy is going 8 months, they are buying less of each months future revenue, while the D one is buying a larger chunk of the next few months, os that does make sense. Also, if you are going out for a longer period of time, credit probably becomes more important, then it would to the D guy.
-
12-16-2015, 10:31 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
- Posts
- 1,746
-
12-16-2015, 10:33 AM #9
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 1,203
-
12-16-2015, 10:36 AM #10
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
- Posts
- 1,746
-
12-16-2015, 10:31 AM #11
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 1,203
As someone who dabbles in the B- to F range I can tell that a lot of the points you've made are correct. However, I'd like to add something that some of you may not have considered. When a D paper shop gets a deal as clean as what you have said, and the only other balance is OnDeck, sometimes they kill the deal knowing that taking the time to fully underwrite when their offer will be completely destroyed, by the other 5-10 funders looking at the file, is a practice in futility. A lot of times I ask myself, what is wrong with this file? On the surface it appears flawless, do I want to invest time in it knowing full well that I'll have to go way out of my comfort zone to get the merchant to go with me?
-
12-16-2015, 10:37 AM #12
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 1,203
Noted. I just didn't want to set myself up for failure, yah know that whole, "Keep expectations low and you're never disappointed" thing.
-
12-16-2015, 10:40 AM #13
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
- Posts
- 1,202
Maybe it was an Everest deal. This month they offer 1.20 buy rate with 550 Fico/12 mo in biz. 15pt max upsell. That might explain it.
-
12-16-2015, 11:09 AM #14
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
- Posts
- 4
For a second position deal?
-
12-16-2015, 10:46 AM #15
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 1,203
They're offering that on a second position deal?
-
12-16-2015, 11:12 AM #16
-
12-16-2015, 11:13 AM #17
Actually good question, I would love to know if the prices Everest is offering are only meant for 1st positions, or for 2nd and 3rd as well.
-
12-16-2015, 12:17 PM #18
- Join Date
- Jul 2015
- Posts
- 1,202
Sorry I took you off topic. But Everest says that the promotional rate is good for a 2nd position if the merchant qualifies. Not good for their A paper 1.15 br/620 Fico/12 month promo offer though.
-
12-16-2015, 12:26 PM #19Zachary Ramirez – CEO
Phone: 562-391-7099
Email: zach@zacharyjosephramirez.com
1661 N. Raymond Ave #265
Anaheim CA 92801
-
12-16-2015, 12:50 PM #20
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- CA
- Posts
- 63
We offer a 1.15 buyate for a first position deal, min fico of 620 and 12 months in business, 15 points Max Upsell. This is for an 8 month term, max deal size is $500,000.
Similar Threads
-
Interesting Read!
By mcaguru in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 0Last Post: 11-23-2015, 03:04 PM -
Interesting Article...
By AndyYSCISOdept in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 2Last Post: 11-16-2015, 11:05 AM -
METRIX can refinance your borrower out of a bad cash advance situation!
By Harrymetrix in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 0Last Post: 01-23-2015, 12:00 PM -
METRIX can refinance your borrower out of a bad cash advance situation!
By Harrymetrix in forum Business LoansReplies: 0Last Post: 01-23-2015, 11:59 AM -
This is interesting!
By CO1 in forum Everything elseReplies: 0Last Post: 09-27-2013, 09:25 AM