Someone was mentioning CashCall.
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member Reputation points: 3217 CO1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    644

    Someone was mentioning CashCall.

    http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-78588050/

  2. #2
    Senior Member Reputation points: 3217 CO1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    644

    Will this change pricing on Ach Deals and MCC?

    http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/178_240/new-york-ag-slaps-chicago-auto-title-lender-1064353-1.html

  3. #3
    Senior Member Reputation points: 3217 CO1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    644

    lending club

    http://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2013/12/27901-watch-lending-club-ceo-renaud-laplanche-testifies-house-committee-small-business/

    Very interesting video

  4. #4
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    The main issue her eis these are personal loans, as opposed to business purchases (which MCA contracts are skillfully and cleverly worded as).

    the only issue is if one of these zealots in the State decides that these "Purchase of Receivables" contracts are de facto loans (which they already did in California)

    All these brokers out there charging these extra fees could be forced to reimburse the merchants along with the funds that charged the 1.48's too....

    All a matter of interpretation and direction of resources

  5. #5
    No kidding. I think they first go after the funders (and their brokers/agents) that have as their primary model to stack 3/4/5x on a business and are taking 30-40% of their revenue. If I were an agent/ISO of those companies I sure wouldn't be on these forums looking for who will take a 4th position on a deal.

    If you have deep pockets you can fend off the zealots - we did it successfully in CA on our MCA product - because it is B2B.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chambo View Post
    The main issue her eis these are personal loans, as opposed to business purchases (which MCA contracts are skillfully and cleverly worded as).

    the only issue is if one of these zealots in the State decides that these "Purchase of Receivables" contracts are de facto loans (which they already did in California)

    All these brokers out there charging these extra fees could be forced to reimburse the merchants along with the funds that charged the 1.48's too....

    All a matter of interpretation and direction of resources

  6. #6
    A forum user Reputation points: 2147483647 Sean Cash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,879

    Quote Originally Posted by CO1 View Post
    http://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2013/12/27901-watch-lending-club-ceo-renaud-laplanche-testifies-house-committee-small-business/

    Very interesting video
    here's the text transcript: http://smallbusiness.house.gov/uploa..._testimony.pdf

    The guy actually uses the term merchant cash advance in his testimony to the members of the House of Representatives and not necessarily in a good way. This may be the first time Congress has ever heard the term before. He does say this though:

    "While traditional sources of capital have pulled back, alternatives are on the rise. Alternative lenders such as online lenders and merchant cash advance providers are the fastest growing segment of the SMB loan market recording a 64% growth in originations in the last 4 years."



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

iBusiness Funding acquires Funding Circle
Fintech Nexus is shutting down
Fed penalizes Evolve Bank


DIRECTORY