The Banks Behind The Funders
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Results 1 to 25 of 25

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    so basically the banks are as close as they can possibly get to the industry already. is it possible for them to set up a subsidiary that isn't bound by fed regulations and go into the cash advance biz directly themselves?

  2. #2
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    With the scrutiny banks are currently under, this would be a rather foolhearty move. Most major banks are publicly traded and thus have to report their financials to the SEC and to the public every three months. You have analysts at companies (and the federalones) who do nothign but comb through these reprots looking for discrepancies/improprieties.

    Easier just to lend the money to the MCA or whatever and have no part of the day to day stuff.

  3. #3
    makes sense. who said trickle-down doesn't work?

  4. #4
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    Quote Originally Posted by cashman View Post
    so basically the banks are as close as they can possibly get to the industry already. is it possible for them to set up a subsidiary that isn't bound by fed regulations and go into the cash advance biz directly themselves?
    Nope. Not if they have a controlling interest

Tags for this Thread



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

Blue Owl Capital acquires Atalaya
Kansas added to disclosure service tool
FIS launches SMB digital lending


DIRECTORY