[funding pro]

after reading through all of this.....sounds to me like the rep at the former Merchant Solutions took the deal as his own, got it funded (where is irrelevant), took the commission, bolted. This rep was a former rep for Billy at the old company, so WBL is going to point at Billy about it. My guess is Billy knows nothing about any of this, just like Pepe didn't.

Also sounds like a lot of speculation about how things work when you are a sub ISO, who works where, who know s what NY is doing vs. FL vs. TX....

Could be, but in the guy's defense, how is that any of his fault if he signed an ISO agreement with WBL and sends the deal to a WBL email address. Doesn't mean they condone this behavior or even knew about it but doesn't clear them of being liable.


EDIT: What John said...

[Chambo]

Could be, but in the guy's defense, how is that any of his fault if he signed an ISO agreement with WBL and sends the deal to a WBL email address. Doesn't mean they condone this behavior or even knew about it but doesn't clear them of being liable.


EDIT: What John said...

but it also means they are going to do some due diligence to see what actually happened, and not just take the word of a ranting rep who has already figuratively spent the money