D and F Funders
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Results 1 to 25 of 46

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Your comments regarding Pearl are not accurate. Yes, they want to be more aggressive on pricing and term in hopes it results in "A" paper deals. But the definition of "A" paper at Pearl and Yellowstone is very different than the real "A" paper companies, like On Deck and CAN. Pearl has not stopped taking HIGH RISK paper, has not stopped doing multi position paper, has not stopped taking merchants with FICO's below 550 (which is so absurd to even say) and sure as hell isn't in the On Deck or CAN market, and really never wants to be. I'm not sure where you are getting your info from, but the information you are posting seems to be a tactic to move paper away from Pearl and push it to Yellowstone. I've noticed it on your last few posts. Not sure if you work there or are just trying to get a rip off other ISO's who haven't figured out how to go direct, but either way, if you want to have a discussion about this, or simply want to get clarification on the information you are posting on this site, PM me. I'd be happy to discuss it with you. But I'd appreciate you not stating information you hear 3rd party that apparently is being relayed to you by someone who knows zero about what goes on here. Thank you.

  2. #2
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    Quote Originally Posted by GoodCustomerService View Post
    Your comments regarding Pearl are not accurate. Yes, they want to be more aggressive on pricing and term in hopes it results in "A" paper deals. But the definition of "A" paper at Pearl and Yellowstone is very different than the real "A" paper companies, like On Deck and CAN. Pearl has not stopped taking HIGH RISK paper, has not stopped doing multi position paper, has not stopped taking merchants with FICO's below 550 (which is so absurd to even say) and sure as hell isn't in the On Deck or CAN market, and really never wants to be. I'm not sure where you are getting your info from, but the information you are posting seems to be a tactic to move paper away from Pearl and push it to Yellowstone. I've noticed it on your last few posts. Not sure if you work there or are just trying to get a rip off other ISO's who haven't figured out how to go direct, but either way, if you want to have a discussion about this, or simply want to get clarification on the information you are posting on this site, PM me. I'd be happy to discuss it with you. But I'd appreciate you not stating information you hear 3rd party that apparently is being relayed to you by someone who knows zero about what goes on here. Thank you.
    Why PM you? why not air out in the open for all to see and comment?

Similar Threads

  1. The Banks Behind The Funders
    By admin in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-19-2016, 09:39 PM
  2. Best Funders to Syndicate with?
    By Andy in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-07-2015, 12:11 PM
  3. Top 10 funders
    By MCA in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-06-2014, 06:31 AM
  4. Worst Funders?
    By michaelh in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-08-2014, 06:32 AM
  5. Funders NOT Brokers
    By hotrod4Data in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 09-30-2014, 05:22 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

Blue Owl Capital acquires Atalaya
Kansas added to disclosure service tool
FIS launches SMB digital lending


DIRECTORY