D and F Funders - Page 2
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 46 of 46
  1. #26
    Banned Reputation points: 17587
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    720

    That's why I played it off quick lol.

    Again, YSC is a great lender and the guys over there are some of the few, real closers I've dealt with in the industry. Just having a little fun.

  2. #27
    Senior Member Reputation points: 13596 isaacdstern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,285

    just trying make a buck over here

  3. #28
    A forum user Reputation points: 2147483647 Sean Cash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,880

    Well OnDeck is losing money every month and they are charging more than 50% APR. Try telling a merchant you don't even break even at that rate, but it's the truth.

  4. #29
    A forum user Reputation points: 2147483647 Sean Cash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,880

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
    YSC deals in Y Paper - as in why would the merchant ever consider a deal like this.

    Hahaha, just busting balls obv, YSC is legit - gets a lot of deals done that very few others can. Jonathan is a hustler over there too.
    Maybe this explains why Pearl got bought out by "Z" Capital

  5. #30
    Senior Member Reputation points: 32550 Funder Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,436

    Does anyone know WHO bought out Pearl? Why the secrecy? Maybe it was OnDeck, and they will use Pearl for all their declines? And that would explain where all their money is going to...

  6. #31
    A forum user Reputation points: 2147483647 Sean Cash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,880

    Quote Originally Posted by Funder Mark View Post
    Does anyone know WHO bought out Pearl? Why the secrecy? Maybe it was OnDeck, and they will use Pearl for all their declines? And that would explain where all their money is going to...
    It was a firm called Z Capital. I wasn't making a joke. The old owners did not stay on. It's literally under new management.

  7. #32
    This acquisition and product adjustment is just like a p/e firm acquiring Tesla and adjusting the manufacturing facilities to make Ford Escorts. What's the logic

  8. #33
    Senior Member Reputation points: 1322
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    195

    good analogy.

    I wonder if all the decline shops out there are seeing more deal flow since Pearl changes over to a traditional funder

  9. #34
    Senior Member Reputation points: 1072 SupremeCapitalGroupinc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    100

    Quote Originally Posted by isaacdstern View Post
    just trying make a buck over here
    That's right ...

  10. #35
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    Well, Pearl is now paying off other funds, so there is definitely a move in the right direction

  11. #36
    jotucker1983
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bizloanbroker View Post
    .........Ever since Pearl got bought out a few weeks ago they stopped doing anything past a 2nd position, anything under a 550 Fico score and have started paying other advance e companies off. Basically they are just another A, B and C funder and barely resemble the old Pearl............I am looking to recruit Iso's to send over to Yellowstone......

    Interesting point of view, well, I have included my opinions on a number of things you said below. To begin though, I don't believe that Pearl Capital's Fico Score cut-off is that high (550) but more along the lines of somewhere under 500, also if they aren't funding anything pass a 2nd position anymore then what is wrong with that decision?


    1.) No Merchant Should Get Anything Beyond A 2nd Position

    No merchant should get anything pass a 2nd position, I have seen merchants with 4th position stacks and NSFs everywhere since the 3rd and 4th stack was funded. The merchant goes from being what this industry defines as a "Premium A" or "B" Merchant, to being what you might define as an "F" merchant based not on their actual operating history, but based on the fact there's four companies with a fixed daily pull in there. That just makes absolutely no sense.

    A 2nd position in and of itself, while it could violate the terms and conditions of the 1st position lender, should only be done when it makes total sense. For example, take a merchant that might qualify for $100,000 with about $1.2 - $2 million in sales, let's say he's at 35% paid on the 1st position deal with a balance totaling around $55,000. A 2nd position of let's say $25,000 - $35,000 because the 1st position lender refuses to initiate a renewal until they are at 60% pay-down, would make sense. Anything more than that is excessive and makes no sense.


    2.) No Merchant With Extremely Bad Credit Should Be Funded

    Not sure how you market, but I don't believe these advances/loans should be used to save a business from going under. If your fico average/calculation is coming in under 480, the risk on the deal is just too excessive. There has to be numerous other creditors that the merchant isn't paying so what makes any Underwriter in this space think the merchant is going to pay them when our creditor position is one of the easiest to circumvent? If the merchant is taking the advance/loan at literally the last minute before the business files bankruptcy, then he has absolutely no intention of paying back the advance/loan.

    Finally, I personally have always hated the business practice of bashing one company to promote your own/another one. If you want to promote another company, then just promote the benefits and features of working with another company. But to bash another company in attempt to make another firm look more "promising" is just a bad business practice.

    Those are my opinions.
    Last edited by jotucker1983; 02-25-2015 at 11:51 AM.

  12. #37
    Senior Member Reputation points: 54989
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    4,713

    Chambo what does it mean for you that they are now paying off others... ?

  13. #38
    Banned Reputation points: 17587
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    720

    If it aint broke, don't fix it lol, enough said. I'm sure Pearl's competitors are thrilled with this change of direction.

  14. #39
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    Quote Originally Posted by mcaguru View Post
    Chambo what does it mean for you that they are now paying off others... ?
    it means that the children have left the playground and the adults have come in to clean up. Jo Tucker's post hit it out of the ballpark.

    Keep it up with 4th, 5th & 6th positions. Just keep your mouth shut and take your medicine like a man when the feds come in and regulate the predators.

  15. #40
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
    If it aint broke, don't fix it lol, enough said. I'm sure Pearl's competitors are thrilled with this change of direction.
    this is definitely opening up market share for those out there who have no skills and cannot close their own deals, so their only hope of to hop on like maggots feeding on a carcass

  16. #41
    Senior Member Reputation points: 1322
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    195

    All I have been saying is simply this:

    With Pearl now doing a more standard product..6-7 month 1.35 factor rate it must be really great for guys like Yellowstone and all the others that fund high risk and declined deals

  17. #42
    Senior Member Reputation points: 54989
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    4,713

    Chambo its not as easy..i tell all new funders to remember the warning they give at the circus " DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME"

  18. #43
    Senior Member Reputation points: 1322
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    195

    I wanted to follow up on my earlier post from the beginning of the week:

    At this point it is really clear that the current Pearl barely resembles the old pearl and because of that guys like Yellowstone and Cresthill are snapping up the old pearl deal flow. I spoke with Isaac from Yellowstone this week and he told me that their submissions and in house funding were up over 20% a day from just 2 weeks ago.

    So for all of you who keep posting that I do not know my ass from my elbow the proof is in the pudding

  19. #44
    Senior Member Reputation points: 13596 isaacdstern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,285

    While I appreciate the endorsement and I can confirm we are up significantly since the Pearl transaction was consummated. Please not post on a public forum about conversations we have just to grab deal flow for yourself

  20. #45
    Senior Member Reputation points: 1322
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    195

    Most of that deal flow gets sent to your company so not sure what your issue is

  21. #46
    There are plenty of us here at Yellowstone ready to get those high risk / declined deals funded, it's a win /win for both the ISO and YSC. If you have any deals you want to send over, we would love to have them.

    -Sal
    646-561-2892

Similar Threads

  1. The Banks Behind The Funders
    By admin in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-19-2016, 09:39 PM
  2. Best Funders to Syndicate with?
    By Andy in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-07-2015, 12:11 PM
  3. Top 10 funders
    By MCA in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-06-2014, 06:31 AM
  4. Worst Funders?
    By michaelh in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-08-2014, 06:32 AM
  5. Funders NOT Brokers
    By hotrod4Data in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 09-30-2014, 05:22 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

LegalZoom partners w/ businessloans.com
iBusiness Funding acquires Funding Circle
Fintech Nexus is shutting down


DIRECTORY