Ontap capital - debate
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Results 1 to 25 of 142

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member Reputation points: 44888
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    843

    Quote Originally Posted by NEWCDAM View Post
    There’s nothing wrong with freedom of speech, and I conducted myself accordingly.

    Refusing to conform to allowing our contract to be breached when it comes to getting paid should NEVER be something that goes ignored or GASLIGHTED.

    I did nothing to harm or destroy their company. Only DEMANDED that my company be paid before pursuing legal, and CHALLENGED the reasons it couldn’t or did not.

    The act of making our company suffer for speaking out against our breach of contract is RETALIATION, and in my opinion, that seems to be the only explanation for not being paid by now.

    This ALL could've been avoided.

    The lesson of finding the right funding partner is well learned.
    No one here blames them. You're a new iso. Your deal misses payments right when its funded. You know and i know you wouldn't of paid the clawback. You have nothings to lose. They have more to lose.

    Seems these guys are legit funders tho so ty for the advertising.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Zonefund View Post
    You know and i know you wouldn't of paid the clawback.
    .
    Clawback period is over now! There was never a need for clawback ANYWAY! At this point in time, Im entitled to receive the check that they are holding, default or not, as per the contract !

    If they DONT want to carry out whats in the contract, then dont create a contract to bait and switch us in the FIRST place.

    Regardless if they have something to lose or not, they understood their risk before they sent us an agreement.

    If you need to gaslight FACTS to sleep better at night, by all means thats YOUR preference.

    But Im not speaking on opinions, should've, would've, could've.

    The FACT is its a small check to them, and a “legit funder” will abide by their clauses!

    Most importantly, its the end of clawback period, They haven't lost anything, and they OWE us our commission !

  3. #3
    Senior Member Reputation points: 33945
    Join Date
    Mar 2024
    Posts
    246

    Quote Originally Posted by NEWCDAM View Post
    Clawback period is over now! There was never a need for clawback ANYWAY! At this point in time, Im entitled to receive the check that they are holding, default or not, as per the contract !

    If they DONT want to carry out whats in the contract, then dont create a contract to bait and switch us in the FIRST place.

    Regardless if they have something to lose or not, they understood their risk before they sent us an agreement.

    If you need to gaslight FACTS to sleep better at night, by all means thats YOUR preference.

    But Im not speaking on opinions, should've, would've, could've.

    The FACT is its a small check to them, and a “legit funder” will abide by their clauses!

    Most importantly, its the end of clawback period, They haven't lost anything, and they OWE us our commission !
    Just sue then.

Similar Threads

  1. Broker Fair 2020 Great debate
    By RickyR3712 in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-09-2020, 04:30 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 02:36 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-01-2015, 02:07 PM
  4. Long Money vs. Short - Figured we could debate this here
    By nwarshaw in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 07-02-2014, 08:57 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

Blue Owl Capital acquires Atalaya
Kansas added to disclosure service tool
FIS launches SMB digital lending


DIRECTORY