[KingVance1]

This is the last reply because we do not have time for a nonsense argument, These are the funders WE trust nobody is asking YOU to trust them, go to Ondeck, Bluevine, IOU, Credibly, Everest and those people if you want to, I CHOOSE to use them because they give me paper A offers because of our volume AND THEY HAVE NEVER SCREWED ME EVER. BUT at the core they are HIGH RISK FUNDERS. Nobody is saying they are the most competitive offers but they are the only ones I trust, so please get over yourself and go fund some deals. And BTW If your mad at your funder for asking for stips its because your trying to screw them, stop being a crybaby about proof of ownership/ A/R and other stips you might need. Yall way to comfortable trying to abuse other peoples money when you more than likely couldn't fund even one 50k deal without giving yourself a daily heart attack if Hes going to default.

[BROKER TIME]

This is the last reply because we do not have time for a nonsense argument, These are the funders WE trust nobody is asking YOU to trust them, go to Ondeck, Bluevine, IOU, Credibly, Everest and those people if you want to, I CHOOSE to use them because they give me paper A offers because of our volume AND THEY HAVE NEVER SCREWED ME EVER. BUT at the core they are HIGH RISK FUNDERS. Nobody is saying they are the most competitive offers but they are the only ones I trust, so please get over yourself and go fund some deals. And BTW If your mad at your funder for asking for stips its because your trying to screw them, stop being a crybaby about proof of ownership/ A/R and other stips you might need. Yall way to comfortable trying to abuse other peoples money when you more than likely couldn't fund even one 50k deal without giving yourself a daily heart attack if Hes going to default.

SELL RATE 1.25 13 POINTS (POSITIONS) that sounds pretty aggressive to me

[SendDocsPlox]

This is the last reply because we do not have time for a nonsense argument, These are the funders WE trust nobody is asking YOU to trust them, go to Ondeck, Bluevine, IOU, Credibly, Everest and those people if you want to, I CHOOSE to use them because they give me paper A offers because of our volume AND THEY HAVE NEVER SCREWED ME EVER. BUT at the core they are HIGH RISK FUNDERS. Nobody is saying they are the most competitive offers but they are the only ones I trust, so please get over yourself and go fund some deals. And BTW If your mad at your funder for asking for stips its because your trying to screw them, stop being a crybaby about proof of ownership/ A/R and other stips you might need. Yall way to comfortable trying to abuse other peoples money when you more than likely couldn't fund even one 50k deal without giving yourself a daily heart attack if Hes going to default.

Imagine unironically thinking Landmark, GFE, or Meged give A Paper offers
I don't think they would even consider their own best deals as A Paper

lol

[Michael I]

This is the last reply because we do not have time for a nonsense argument, These are the funders WE trust nobody is asking YOU to trust them, go to Ondeck, Bluevine, IOU, Credibly, Everest and those people if you want to, I CHOOSE to use them because they give me paper A offers because of our volume AND THEY HAVE NEVER SCREWED ME EVER. BUT at the core they are HIGH RISK FUNDERS. Nobody is saying they are the most competitive offers but they are the only ones I trust, so please get over yourself and go fund some deals. And BTW If your mad at your funder for asking for stips its because your trying to screw them, stop being a crybaby about proof of ownership/ A/R and other stips you might need.

Ok so top 3 you trust, fair enough. But bottom line you are giving your clients less competitive offers and getting paid less commission because you do not trust the standard A paper funders.
Also i hate that line of "If your mad at your funder for asking for stips its because your trying to screw them" if 2 funders give the same approvals and one has a stip list from hell and the other one has zero , why would i want to do the extra work of gathering all those stips ?

[Michael I]

. Yall way to comfortable trying to abuse other peoples money when you more than likely couldn't fund even one 50k deal without giving yourself a daily heart attack if Hes going to default.

most of these funders are playing with someone else money and the iso that syndicate is the one actually using their own money

[Adam2326]

most of these funders are playing with someone else money and the iso that syndicate is the one actually using their own money

Funders are becoming brokers, and brokers are becoming funders. The whole thing is turning into a convoluted mess in my opinion. I can respect working very closely with some of the higher risk funders that you would consider boutique. My top 3 would look different from the OP's list. But there is nothing like establishing a relationship with one of these smaller funders so you can actually trust the people your working with, and get some of those out of the box deals funded that otherwise would be declined.

But to Michael's point, that doesn't mean you stop working with the EBF's, ODC's, & Rapids of the world. Those companies are trustworthy, its the people working there you have to worry about. But you have the same opportunity to establish a relationship with your OnDeck rep, that you do with the boutique.