Results 51 to 75 of 129
-
11-04-2021, 12:34 PM #51
Reputation points: 14400
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 339
Sitting around creating meme's when monies were not paid is not cool.
Last edited by Shorebird; 11-05-2021 at 02:22 PM.
-
11-04-2021, 12:35 PM #52
Reputation points: 305250
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 3,318
oooooh the plot thickens
-
11-04-2021, 01:45 PM #53
Yes... There are multiple ISO's that are missing money in this situation so if the thought process was this is just a Splash commission payment dispute that's not accurate. Aside from that commission we are missing money from our syndication and other deals commissions from other funders than Splash. So if the issue was receipt of the Splash payment alone, the other money would be paid out to us, along with the other ISO's involved. I can respect that outsiders looking in might think things escalated rather quickly on this post. But the fact is we have been completely silent for weeks working with SBL in an effort to resolve the issue. Ryan has personally been speaking with me on a daily basis all month about the issue doing what I felt was everything in his power to get it resolved. Stories had changed a few times, but what was consistent is Ryan being transparent about what was being told to him by James. I know there were multiple conversations between the two of them where Ryan was trying to get our money sent any way he could for the syndication at minimum. And I know Ryan asked many times for a bank statement to verify they had not received a payment from Splash but James never provided it to us. At this point I feel like Ryan should be stepping aside so James can explain directly to the ISO's involved in this mess what is plan is to resolve the many issues.
-
11-04-2021, 02:07 PM #54
To put things in perspective here is what we are owed in total:
$7,000 Commission on Funded MCA
$4,588 in participation money for MCA's Paid In Full last month
$11,195 Right To Receive from MCA participation
$4,905.48 Commission on Funded MCA
TOTAL $27,688.48
Now the issue I also have with this situation is our Syndication numbers are as follows: Average Factor 1.52, Average Term 1.9 Months So simply the $7,000 commission being 30 days late cost us $1,820. Not to mention everything else... As this continues to drag out the loss continues to compound further. Not to mention the time wasted on the situation, the demoralization of the sales rep etc.
-
11-04-2021, 02:15 PM #55
Reputation points: 203690
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 1,366
so no one else saw the email that was posted from OP from the funder saying it was requested commission get sent to a different account which is was? ...maybe i misunderstood
-
11-04-2021, 02:16 PM #56
Reputation points: 107104
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
- Posts
- 827
-
11-04-2021, 02:18 PM #57
Reputation points: 1328
- Join Date
- Nov 2016
- Posts
- 44
Just an outside perspective here but if those are the types of deals you are funding with them then it’s safe to say your money is bye bye. The defaults caught up with them. 1.50 40 day deals don’t last forever.
On a side note if they can’t pay you 27k in commissions then idk what they use to fund deals. The well is dry.
-
11-04-2021, 02:26 PM #58
Reputation points: 305250
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 3,318
-
11-04-2021, 02:34 PM #59
-
11-04-2021, 02:36 PM #60
We were aware of this part of the scenario from the beginning, the "New Account" was an account we had made payments to and received payments from multiple times so this wasn't a red flag. It was a legitimate account change we were aware of. They shared the email chain with Splash from the beginning because when they requested to change the account, splash responded with the date they would be paying comp to this new account.
-
11-04-2021, 02:42 PM #61
I appreciate the insight and I can agree with you to an extent. In all of the years I've been involved in MCA the only deals I've ever had success with have been these kinds of high risk deals. The A-B paper 9-12 month deals I've participated in had a much higher default rate due to stacking etc The shorter term deals have always outperformed the "Lower Risk" deals in my book. Of the syndication we've done with SBL only 1 deal missed any payments and negotiated a reduced payment, and has been making good on those payments. So I can appreciate that defaults take place especially in high risk deals, but when it's not my deals defaulting it's not my problem. At least it should not be.
-
11-04-2021, 02:56 PM #62
Reputation points: 752
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 185
it is sad that there are other brokers finding this post funny. $7K isn't a trivial sum. Neither is $29K or any of the other deals where commissions/syndicate funds are owed.
A lender is stiffing commissions yet continuing to solicit business. To mention that, no matter what the tone (and of course it's going to be in an upsetting one given that nearly a month of expenses are now gone) isn't unprofessional.Last edited by aak723; 11-04-2021 at 02:58 PM.
-
11-04-2021, 03:00 PM #63
Reputation points: 752
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 185
-
11-04-2021, 03:54 PM #64
Reputation points: 86941
- Join Date
- Feb 2018
- Posts
- 1,349
Is this company based out of Hartford CT with CEO JAMES D? And why are ISOs running deals through a broker?
Last edited by fundingsmbs; 11-04-2021 at 03:57 PM.
-
11-04-2021, 04:07 PM #65
Yes SBL from Hartford, James Delices = CEO / We personally would co broker in situations where they were signed up with a boutique we weren't and could get a better deal via their relationships. For example, this deal in question we were able to get 50k paying 10pts as our best option, they got 55k paying 15% from Splash. They took 2% for co-brokering and we took 13%. We made more money working it through them, and we would reach out to Splash after the deal was done if we felt more business could be done with them directly. But if we're funding 1 or 2 deals a month with that funder there's no reason to sign up IMO
-
11-04-2021, 04:51 PM #66
Reputation points: 28835
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
- Posts
- 209
This just doesn't seem worth it for $2,150. Don't get me wrong; I co-broker a fair bit both ways but that is because one of the parties does not focus on that product. To your point, it does not take 30 days to fix this issue. Syndication is unacceptable. The funder has entitled profit that they can pay out syndicators if the money is actually frozen. If fraud is not happening, then it is just a rookie operation that had all their eggs in one basket BUT if they are funding still, then all their money is not frozen and they have backup accounts so why can't RTR get paid out?
Bottom line: It does not take 30+ to fix a bank account especially when you are a funder.
-
11-04-2021, 05:27 PM #67
What we have here is what us Cubans call "Arroz con Mango"
The Brokers Nightmare
I don't want peace, I want problems, ALWAYS!
Florida-Based
-
11-04-2021, 05:34 PM #68
-
11-09-2021, 01:10 PM #69
Just an update I have been able to speak with James and we were able to get a payment for $1,000 yesterday to go towards the outstanding balance with SBL. He did confirm that the Splash commission came into their account so there is no issue with Splash sending out comp. It is simply a matter of getting our piece of it at this point. Along with the syndication money.
-
11-09-2021, 01:46 PM #70
Reputation points: 305250
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 3,318
-
11-09-2021, 03:40 PM #71
Reputation points: 147
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Posts
- 27
-
11-10-2021, 12:11 PM #72
Reputation points: 14491
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Posts
- 123
They confirmed they were trying to get paid twice on the commission from Splash. Classic
-
11-10-2021, 12:35 PM #73
Reputation points: 14400
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 339
I have not received anything from them yet.
-
11-10-2021, 12:38 PM #74
Reputation points: 14491
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Posts
- 123
Squeaky wheel gets the oil
-
11-10-2021, 12:50 PM #75
Reputation points: 14400
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 339
Yeah, but they spend more time bull****ting people than working.
I have been stroked since Friday for a measly $600.
It is now Wednesday and they can't even come up with $600 to pay me on a renewal of 12k-1.49-60 deal.
Not to mention another $5800 in commish from month ago.
Maybe a Debanked video on this would serve our community well going forward.Last edited by Shorebird; 11-10-2021 at 12:53 PM.
Similar Threads
-
Jimmy's Landscaping, LLC and James Marshall Shelburne
By Showmethemoney in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 7Last Post: 05-23-2022, 03:07 PM -
James Everett Shelton
By mrmrg in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 8Last Post: 06-21-2019, 12:52 PM -
Viking Funding Group & Ryan Cola
By PatrickMTKT in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 28Last Post: 04-28-2016, 07:48 AM -
Issues with CAN?
By funding pro in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 2Last Post: 04-23-2015, 02:14 PM