Results 26 to 37 of 37
-
10-23-2014, 07:17 AM #26
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 409
[QUOTE=Lendini;12504][QUOTE=JayBallentine;12502]Interesting... I'm seeing more and more sites reference "technology" when there really is none. I guess companies are seeing the value in ease and speed, so if you don't actually make it easier and faster, you should pretend I suppose...[/QUOTE
Never said the word "fake."
WWW.BUILTWITH.COM
PUT IN THE FOLLOWING SITES:
1. Yours.
2. Ours.
3. Fundera.
4. Others in fintech.
Point being. You're using the Lavarel MVC framework... Which runs on PHP. That's kind of concerning because the Lavarel framework has a vulnerability which allows attackers to impersonate user sessions via modified cookies. In short, if I was a scumbag, I could bring it down without even trying. Moreover, it's marketed to "artisan coders." Not sure if it was designed for commercially viable enterprise web offerings.
I also assumed there was no tech because there is no SSL... or any other security credentials... Didn't think that if there was stuff under the hood, you'd expose yourself this way... I'm wrong I guess.Last edited by JayBallentine; 10-23-2014 at 07:37 AM.
-
10-23-2014, 08:44 AM #27
Thanks for the breakdown Jay, we'll definitely look into it.
As far as under the hood, the technology has to do with our automated decision making process and with minimal back-end stips, electronic signing and full API integration gives us the ability to fund fast.
-
10-23-2014, 08:52 AM #28
yes. many times.. 1 bank in particular has sued many times for tortious interference and has won. I also know of at least 1 other case that is in court now. I have to agree with Sean on this one. If you are a stacker I hope you have plenty of cash reserve because there is a good chance you will end up in court sooner rather then later
-
10-23-2014, 09:08 AM #29
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Posts
- 21
Could you please share the case information or the name of the bank that's suing? It's public information if they'd filed a lawsuit so I wouldn't think they'd have a problem and I would guess they would want others to know they won't be stacked on.
I keep hearing about all these suits but I've yet to see particulars. Sending out demand letters is not the same thing as filing a compliant in court.
-
10-23-2014, 11:15 AM #30
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 283
I'm not a Stacker(personally). I have brokered 2nd position deals, but usually stick to firsts....I was seriously just wondering if a lawsuit has actually gone to trial and what the outcome was. Does this bank take the Funder who stacked AND the Merchant to court? What type of defense was used against the tortious interference complaint?
-
10-23-2014, 11:50 AM #31
I guess they could go after both, but it would make sense to go after the funding company (deeper pockets). Plus, the company doesn't want all the bad press.
I guess you have to have a lot of CASH & CAPITAL, even if you are a MERCHANT (hint, hint, hint) to go through with these lawsuits and filings
-
10-23-2014, 03:16 PM #32
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 22
-
10-23-2014, 05:37 PM #33
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 283
-
10-23-2014, 06:16 PM #34
I don't think there is a defense. Some are summary judgment without the stacker even presenting anything. Others go the settlement route. The stackers tend to throw money at it to make it go away and then make a conscious decision not to stack on that particular funder again going forward.
We've had funders come on here with a reputation for stacking specifically name other funders that they won't stack on. It's not just because they respect them, it's because they don't want to get blown up by them.
For those asking me to point them to public court documents, it's not really my place to do that. If a funder wants to share them with the world they can. There are many states in the country to file and more than a thousand funders in the industry. They're not easy to find.
My point is this. If you're running around out there with a hotmail account telling people you do 5th positions, you're a time bomb. If you couldn't afford a lawyer to draft up a contract so you just copied and pasted someone else's, you're a time bomb. And if you're funding under those circumstances anyway and doing it with borrowed money, you're an atom bomb.
If you can't afford a real lawyer, you should not be a funder period.Last edited by Sean Cash; 10-23-2014 at 06:18 PM.
-
10-24-2014, 11:39 AM #35
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Posts
- 116
-
10-24-2014, 02:21 PM #36
-
10-24-2014, 02:25 PM #37
Similar Threads
-
Stacking and Double Dippin
By LoanShark714 in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 1Last Post: 05-12-2014, 01:24 PM -
Instead of stacking... what if...???
By Ryan Shiroky in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 45Last Post: 04-28-2014, 10:19 AM -
Sfs stacking
By gc543 in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 3Last Post: 04-14-2014, 11:53 AM -
Stacking Madness
By jbrown in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 84Last Post: 03-26-2014, 11:06 AM -
Stacking Question
By skideeppow in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 33Last Post: 12-05-2013, 01:18 AM