Results 1 to 25 of 179
Hybrid View
-
08-08-2020, 03:44 PM #1
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Posts
- 2,049
What was that now?????
https://debanked.com/2020/08/the-sec...he-real-loser/
-
08-08-2020, 06:59 PM #2
- Join Date
- Aug 2020
- Posts
- 6
I think you're missing the crux of the SEC's case. The fundamental point they are making is that pursuant to Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, it is unlawful to obtain money by means of any untrue statement.
Par allegedly told investors that their default rate was 1% and they used it in marketing materials, in person presentations and via email according to the complaint. They also had $300M in litigation. For this to be true, mathematically, they would've needed to fund $30 billion. Given the $600M they consistently claimed they funded, 1% is only $6M in defaults. Lets say their factor rate is 1.5, 1% of $900M is only $9M in defaults. The SEC's case seems pretty rock solid.
-
08-09-2020, 11:07 PM #3
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
- Posts
- 6
Par's attorneys told the judge that Par's default rate on a "cash-on-cash" basis was indeed 1.2%. This is going to be one heck of a show. If the basis for the lawsuit and asset freeze was the alleged misrepresentation of the default rate and that turns out to be the actual default rate, (under that methodology anyway), then....
Last edited by UrsulaHaun; 08-09-2020 at 11:15 PM.
-
08-10-2020, 12:29 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 754
-
08-10-2020, 07:58 AM #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2020
- Posts
- 6
"And the merchant default rates are excellent. Put simply, the merchant cash over cash default exposure is 1.2%. That means that of all merchants receiving $100 in cash from CBSG, only $1.20 (1.2%) is defaulted on."
That also means that their default rate over the RTR is less than 1% since they are using the funded amount. Their math doesn't make sense. With $300M in litigation. I call bull **** and anyone that believes that is delusional.
Not to mention they only included one paragraph about their default rates and no mention whatsoever about the insurance they presumably offered.Last edited by SmartestGuyInTheRoom; 08-10-2020 at 09:16 AM.
-
08-10-2020, 11:01 AM #6
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
- Posts
- 122
-
08-10-2020, 09:31 AM #7
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 3,322
-
08-10-2020, 10:14 AM #8
- Join Date
- Aug 2020
- Posts
- 6
-
08-10-2020, 10:29 AM #9
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 754
Actually if they kept 99% of their cash, monthly, with the daily debits and renewals, why can’t this be true?
Basically it means they’re not loosing cash, which might be true no?
-
08-10-2020, 01:18 PM #10
- Join Date
- Aug 2020
- Posts
- 6