Results 1 to 25 of 44
-
04-02-2020, 06:27 PM #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Broomall, PA
- Posts
- 123
Looking for ISOs: Refinancing Merchant Cash Advances to a 24 to 36-Month Term Loan
We do MCA refinance (consolidations) into a 24 to 36-month term loan with ONE MONTHLY PAYMENT and offer new working capital at closing.
We are direct lenders and use our own capital to lend.
We are currently lending and haven't stopped.
Massive opportunity with our product in the small business landscape right now and for months/years to come.
Stefan Bernarsky
CIO
Kanjorski Partners LLC
570-862-7279 call or text
www.kanjorskipartners.com/refinance
-
04-10-2020, 12:14 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Posts
- 2,049
I think the whole forum knows what you do by now guy
-
04-10-2020, 12:48 PM #3
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Posts
- 238
-
04-10-2020, 01:34 PM #4
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 598
-
04-10-2020, 01:39 PM #5
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Broomall, PA
- Posts
- 123
We do not lend in CA and we only do non-mortgage, business/commercial lending.
-
04-10-2020, 01:51 PM #6
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 598
-
04-10-2020, 01:51 PM #7
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Broomall, PA
- Posts
- 123
No they are not.
-
04-10-2020, 05:18 PM #8
- Join Date
- Apr 2019
- Posts
- 318
-
04-10-2020, 05:20 PM #9
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 598
Either they are in noncompliance with regulations and banking laws, or they are full of sh@t....me thinks both lol
-
04-11-2020, 01:45 AM #10
You do not need a lender's license to operate in most states, even if you are structuring your transactions as a business loan.
Zachary Ramirez – CEO
Phone: 562-391-7099
Email: zach@zacharyjosephramirez.com
1661 N. Raymond Ave #265
Anaheim CA 92801
-
04-14-2020, 08:35 PM #11
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Broomall, PA
- Posts
- 123
You are correct Zach. I am glad you do your research which FCF clearly does not. He is engaged in "group speak" on this one for sure. He is fairly intelligent in other posts yet completely misses the mark on this discussions and is just flat wrong. FCF Fund doesn't know what he is talking about when it comes to state and federal regulation of non-mortgage business loans. There is very little that governs a non-mortgage business loan in most all states. There are only usury laws in each state and a few states where a license is needed like CA. Other than that, this is what the UCC is for to govern interstate commerce. And to go even further, FCF, why do MCA companies even file UCCs since they are not even secured parties other than the receivables they purchase, yet they purchase receivables and get businesses and business owners to sell their receivable and/or future sales? And in most instances its not even theirs receivable or business asset to legally sell as more senior creditors already have a blanket UCC lien over all the collateral. MCAs are a contractual joke and they are predatory; payday loans for businesses.
The wake of this COVID epidemic will bring waves of class actions law suits against MCA companies and recharacterizations of advances into loans. Wait and see. Just ask Soft Bank about Kabbage.Last edited by KanjorskiPartners; 04-14-2020 at 08:43 PM.
-
04-14-2020, 08:44 PM #12
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Broomall, PA
- Posts
- 123
-
04-23-2020, 09:05 AM #13
- Join Date
- Apr 2017
- Posts
- 127
-
04-23-2020, 10:37 AM #14
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Broomall, PA
- Posts
- 123
We only do MCA refinances and we have a $150k minimum refinance amount.
-
04-23-2020, 10:45 AM #15
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Posts
- 38
are you a debt consolidation company? do tell merchants to stop paying there old advances?
-
04-23-2020, 11:27 AM #16
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
- Posts
- 831
-
04-23-2020, 06:49 PM #17
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Broomall, PA
- Posts
- 123
No we do not tell merchants to stop paying their old advances. We pay off their MCAs and get them zero balance letters. We roll it all into one loan at the par value owed on a 24 to 36-month amortization with one monthly payment.
-
04-23-2020, 07:55 PM #18
- Join Date
- Jun 2017
- Posts
- 2,049
-
04-23-2020, 10:10 PM #19
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Posts
- 781
If hes paying the mca off early you can ask to pay less as full settlement. They are getting the mca paid off early. If mca comoany agrees whats the issue ??
-
04-23-2020, 10:46 PM #20
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Broomall, PA
- Posts
- 123
Well Ryan and Ricky, please tell me the difference between these two hypothetical transactions. Ricky you will find that your statement is incorrect. My apologies in advance to make you actually have to think.
********WHAT WE DO NOT NOT NOT DO**********
DEBT SETTLEMENT (what we DO NOT DO) (or is it "Advance Settlement"...we all know advances are debts/loans and not anything else if we are being honest):
$100,000 owed at $16,667 per month in daily payments
factor rate 1.33 over 6 months; original net amount to merchant ~$75,000 (or less after closing costs are removed from net amount raising the factor rate actually)
3 months into a 6 month advance duration, payments lowered to $5000 per month by a debt settlement company through tortious interference (but more importantly because the company can't sustain paying out a year's worth of equity in 4 months plus having to contribute more through "stacking" or "reverse ponzi schemes" as I like to call them, but that's another conversation)
remaining duration extended by 3.3x times therefore the ROI for the MCA company goes way down (~70% decrease in ROI) and the risk to their capital goes way up (proportionally)
lump sum payment to the MCA company $0
**************WHAT WE DO DO DO, DO*****************
DEBT REFINANCE (what we DO):
$100,000 owed at $16,667 per month in daily payments
factor rate 1.33x over 6 months
3 months into a 6 month advance duration, we do a lump sum pay off
lump sum pay off $87,375 to the MCA company on the $100,000 "remaining balance"
MCA company gets their 5.5% per month on their money like they would on a 1.333 over 6 months w/ daily payments and they can re-advance the money/put it out new/recycle it/etc)
Every MCA company (that understands return on capital and return of capital) that we deal with do our deals ALL DAY LONG especially when they find out that there are multiple stacks on the file and their risk has exponentially increased with each stack.
Please, again, tell me how DEBT SETTLEMENT and DEBT REFINANCE are same the same thing and then I can tell you that you know nothing about finance or return on or of capital.
Perhaps I am wrong and 2 + 2 really does = fishLast edited by KanjorskiPartners; 04-23-2020 at 11:01 PM.
-
04-23-2020, 11:16 PM #21
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
- Posts
- 831
Read what I wrote.I understand what you are .But bottom line it goes by what funders consider it.I have no issue submitting a file to you but I will need in writing that the funders that I work with and have renewals with will not cut me off and not a single one was willing to.
Has anyone on here gotten a different response?I assume admin agrees with you as he never banned you
-
04-24-2020, 08:09 AM #22
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 102
The bottom line, is that original 'total payback' is not being paid back. In your example, the MCA company is getting $12,625 less than what is stated on the contract. You are using the word 'interest' which is the difference here. It's a very clear stated payback amount on an MCA. Anything less than that is technically considered a default. Most MCA companies won't default the client if an agreement is reached - but it's exponentially harder to get a merchant an MCA once they have 'settled' on a prior MCA. I don't think any broker on here would risk their direct lender relationships - or risk the chance that they will never be able to do another MCA for whichever client takes part in this.
Last edited by FHFunding; 04-24-2020 at 08:14 AM. Reason: accuracy
-
04-24-2020, 08:13 AM #23
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 102
-
04-24-2020, 08:32 AM #24
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 3,433
FHF, there are no rules in the industry, remember? It's still the wild west. "It's technically considered a default" is in the eyes of the beholder. Everyone wants to not pay a premium for money, and there's nothing wrong or illegal about good-faith negotiations. If the MCA companies cared about "their" merchants, then they would be thrilled that they found something else. Instead, it's a show of "selling cash" and selling bandaids as "real" solutions. Funders have obligations to resell their investors money, and want the entire balance paid-in-full. The funders legally bought the future receivables, there's nothing wrong with them demanding the entire amount (there is a contract after all ), but there's something wrong with someone saying that good faith negotiations are "technically defaults."
If a merchant successfully negotiated an early payoff, there's no law stating that the funder needs to write "settled" on a ZBL, nothing preventing them from saying "paid in full." They just might do it anyway. Both may be accurate statements.
Also, I don't think that a merchant who's entering a 24-month program with a balloon will be going back for MCAs so quickly (at least I hope not). Saving the merchant the money on the payoff and increasing cash-flow might save their business.
Trying not to take sides, just pointing out what is obvious to me.
-
04-24-2020, 08:39 AM #25
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 102
Similar Threads
-
Looking for ISOs: Refinancing Merchant Cash Advances to a 24 to 36-Month Term Loan
By KanjorskiPartners in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 6Last Post: 04-16-2020, 09:47 AM -
Looking for ISOs: Refinancing Merchant Cash Advances to a 24 to 36-Month Term Loan
By KanjorskiPartners in forum Deal BinReplies: 32Last Post: 04-04-2020, 02:04 PM -
Merchant Cash Advances vs. Loans
By Sean Cash in forum Everything elseReplies: 0Last Post: 05-19-2014, 01:08 PM -
Merchant Cash and Capital Receives $75 Million Term Loan from Investment Consortium
By CO1 in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 6Last Post: 03-18-2014, 09:03 AM