Results 1 to 25 of 34
Threaded View
-
10-03-2014, 01:52 PM #7
There are already a few funders that are absolute poison to stack on because they will in fact sue you, not just make idle complaints and threats about it.
There are also quite a bit of behind the scenes settlements occurring in which stackers are writing checks for damages to the funders they stacked on.
Since it seems like everybody off the street is a funder now and half those companies are entering the space without the budget for a decent lawyer or any lawyer at all, I would highly suggest that they don't stack. Too many new entrants have been ill-advised of the risks, lack understanding of the product they're offering, and operate at their own legal and financial peril.
And similarly, I think we are seeing too many new entrants operating under the false assumption that a standard MCA is a 3 month program, that terms are fixed, that stacking is the basis for the industry, and that you can call a purchase of future receivables a loan. People that are syndicating with fly-by-night funders have no idea what they are doing and will wake up one day and realize their money is gone.
I get email and phone solicitations from funders pitching 5th to 8th position stacks. Their days are numbered.Last edited by Sean Cash; 10-03-2014 at 01:54 PM.
Similar Threads
-
Need To Stop The Bleeding
By 1StopFunding in forum Deal BinReplies: 4Last Post: 06-19-2014, 11:47 AM -
Instead of stacking... what if...???
By Ryan Shiroky in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 45Last Post: 04-28-2014, 10:19 AM -
Namaa initiates no stacking policy for lenders: Who is namaa?????
By 1StopFunding in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 11Last Post: 04-15-2014, 09:48 AM -
Sfs stacking
By gc543 in forum Merchant Cash AdvanceReplies: 3Last Post: 04-14-2014, 11:53 AM