https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

The term alluded to Barbra Streisand, who had sued photographer Kenneth Adelman and Pictopia.com for violation of privacy.[6] The US$50 million lawsuit endeavored to remove an aerial photograph of Streisand's mansion from the publicly available collection of 12,000 California coastline photographs.[2][7][8] Adelman photographed the beachfront property to document coastal erosion as part of the California Coastal Records Project, which was intended to influence government policymakers.[9][10] Before Streisand filed her lawsuit, "Image 3850" had been downloaded from Adelman's website only six times; two of those downloads were by Streisand's attorneys.[11] As a result of the case, public knowledge of the picture increased greatly; more than 420,000 people visited the site over the following month.[12] The lawsuit was dismissed and Streisand was ordered to pay Adelman's legal fees, which amounted to $155,567.
Before MCAGURU failed to respond to accusations of questionable responses, "Iso: Peak solutions llc" had been viewed on DailyFunder's website only fifteen times; four of those views were by MCAGURU himself. As a result of the refusal to respond, public knowledge of the questionable business practices increased greatly; more than 9,000 views ensued in the following month. The lawsuit was not necessary as MCAGURU was determined to be guilty in the court of public opinion.