deal issue
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Results 1 to 25 of 80

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Do NOT bash my name or ML Factors!

    ML Factors has no affiliation to this in any way. ML is a direct funder.

    Please do not make false accusations as to how you claim this industry to be.

    They have never had any involvement in outsourcing any deals.

    I represent ML Factors as an ISO Representative. I have been in this position for 2 years now.

    You recently sent me a submission asking for capital. ML made an approval and you did not want it.

    I have known the people working at HFH for a while and only sent it to their underwriter in order to help your company close your deal since there was no way to close the 50K approval.

    I do not do that with any other deals. Solely this file to HELP you.

    You say that this was ugly on my end yet you failed to mention what your intentions were.

    You noticed that the merchant received 250K and another 100K sent to another account.

    So in this case you wanted this to be reviewed as a 3rd yet you decide to let me know when contracts are being made that the "100K funded never went into the persons account."

    You wanted to see if you could get away with that and receive a higher approval and more commission but I said that its a bad idea and it would put people in hot water.

    Your response was "I thought you wanted to make money."

    So who really is the bad guy in this dilemma that you created?

    I did not know that HFHs contract had a syndication with another lender for this specific file. They are working on becoming a direct funder.

    You got the exact amount as you requested and because you were upset on how you didnt expect the contract to have another name on it, as did I, you were offered 15 points.

    So you decide to bash my name on this site.

    I promise you I have always been truthful to all of my brokers. I would never do anything to give any company a bad name.

    You've been submitting to me at ML since June and finally brought 2 decent files that actually got approved by us, which shocked me, and wanted more money.

    For whomever is reading this, please know that ML had nothing to do with this.

    I did. All I wanted to do was help out a broker with what he needed. I am truly sorry for all those that work for ML. I didn't mean for this to happen. I just wanted to help.

    Kindest Regards,

    Jayson Molinares







    Quote Originally Posted by Michael_Prompt View Post
    So we sent this guy at ml factors a deal who said he has another platform also at hfh. He gave us an offer at ml 50k 50 days. So I told him it was not enough and he told me his other platform would do 75k. So than I requested contracts and on the contracts It was app funding. We deal with app funding ourselves and if we wanted to send our deal there we would have. Just wanted to say this game turned so ugly with pretend funders brokering to other pretend funders to the actual funder. This industry is so saturated with ugly sh*** like this. Can I get some opinions.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Reputation points: 47257
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Basalt CO
    Posts
    867

    Quote Originally Posted by JaysonML View Post
    ML Factors has no affiliation to this in any way. ML is a direct funder.

    Please do not make false accusations as to how you claim this industry to be.

    They have never had any involvement in outsourcing any deals.

    I represent ML Factors as an ISO Representative. I have been in this position for 2 years now.

    You recently sent me a submission asking for capital. ML made an approval and you did not want it.

    I have known the people working at HFH for a while and only sent it to their underwriter in order to help your company close your deal since there was no way to close the 50K approval.

    I do not do that with any other deals. Solely this file to HELP you.

    You say that this was ugly on my end yet you failed to mention what your intentions were.

    You noticed that the merchant received 250K and another 100K sent to another account.

    So in this case you wanted this to be reviewed as a 3rd yet you decide to let me know when contracts are being made that the "100K funded never went into the persons account."

    You wanted to see if you could get away with that and receive a higher approval and more commission but I said that its a bad idea and it would put people in hot water.

    Your response was "I thought you wanted to make money."

    So who really is the bad guy in this dilemma that you created?

    I did not know that HFHs contract had a syndication with another lender for this specific file. They are working on becoming a direct funder.

    You got the exact amount as you requested and because you were upset on how you didnt expect the contract to have another name on it, as did I, you were offered 15 points.

    So you decide to bash my name on this site.

    I promise you I have always been truthful to all of my brokers. I would never do anything to give any company a bad name.

    You've been submitting to me at ML since June and finally brought 2 decent files that actually got approved by us, which shocked me, and wanted more money.

    For whomever is reading this, please know that ML had nothing to do with this.

    I did. All I wanted to do was help out a broker with what he needed. I am truly sorry for all those that work for ML. I didn't mean for this to happen. I just wanted to help.

    Kindest Regards,

    Jayson Molinares
    Remind me never to send anything this guys way.
    I put my contact info in here, and
    was bombarded with spam from funders
    if you need to reach me PM me

Similar Threads

  1. Backdoor issue
    By Michael I in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-12-2017, 09:37 AM
  2. Credibly issue
    By Eric Matthews in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-29-2016, 01:17 PM
  3. Has anyone had this issue with Yellowstone?
    By JSL23 in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-01-2014, 12:47 PM
  4. NEW ISSUE for 3rd TIME THIS WEEK....
    By AndyYSCISOdept in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-21-2014, 09:29 AM
  5. DF MAG Issue #2
    By Capital Stack in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-04-2014, 02:01 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

Pipe secures $100M credit facility
Cloudsquare: 14 new lender APIs
FundKite survey finds 77%


DIRECTORY