Quote Originally Posted by Nunya View Post
Genuinely curious as to why you think that looks bad.
Because it looks like you are reaching for straws...toss everyone in and the kitchen sink...which takes away from the argument of a direct specific tortious interference that caused the initial breach or the initial money to be lost...not an ongoing ponzi pay yourself scheme

it makes the merchant look like a giant con artist and not the funders fault

( in my eyes)