High Approval Came with "Max Upsell" Restriction
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Results 1 to 25 of 31

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member Reputation points: 1393
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    358

    Hey guys,

    First off, I really appreciate everyone's response. Proud to see a like-minded group here that can look out for each other.

    To reiterate - there was nothing wrong with the structure of the deal that should have restricted our commission. I just think it happened to be so large a deal that the funder did not want to add further debt to the deal already that big. But it should all be relative and proportionate, of course.

    Once confronting the lender, they took off the restriction and have been otherwise cooperative and helpful. I'm sure they realized we had other options.

    I would just caution all the other ISO's out there to stand your ground. It's not as if we have a union so coming here to report these issues is a good asset.

    JSL23 - thanks for telling it straight. I think I am going to start a thread on what we ISO's need to start incorporating into our agreements with these lenders. I don't have the time to deal with the BS from deal to deal.

  2. #2
    Veteran Reputation points: 135672 Chambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,189

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickfunder View Post

    JSL23 - thanks for telling it straight. I think I am going to start a thread on what we ISO's need to start incorporating into our agreements with these lenders. I don't have the time to deal with the BS from deal to deal.
    This sounds like a noble cause in theory.

    However

    If you are not submitting volume or have a stronghold form which to fight back, that MCA will simply tell you to kick rocks

    when negotiating, come from a position of strength.. Otherwise, you just come across as a trouble maker and a whiner

    Anyway, my two cents.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Reputation points: 1393
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    358

    Quote Originally Posted by Chambo View Post
    This sounds like a noble cause in theory.

    However

    If you are not submitting volume or have a stronghold form which to fight back, that MCA will simply tell you to kick rocks

    when negotiating, come from a position of strength.. Otherwise, you just come across as a trouble maker and a whiner

    Anyway, my two cents.
    The irony of that, Chambo, is no one wants to submit after being stepped on. There's plenty of lenders out there now that are happy to take on new business. We need standard practices that range from this issue to exclusivity on first submission, same comm. for renewals, etc. It's a long list.

Similar Threads

  1. Question; Why Do Funders "Hide" UCC's?
    By JayBallentine in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-02-2014, 11:55 AM
  2. Press "1" campaigns feedback
    By 1StopFunding in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-25-2014, 10:32 PM
  3. Any "Corp-Only" Working Capital Lenders?
    By Always Consulting in forum Business Loans
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-24-2014, 08:30 PM
  4. Are funders using this "trick" on a wholesale basis?
    By JayBallentine in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-17-2014, 07:43 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-19-2013, 02:07 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

eBay announces new MCA program
Lendistry welcomes new CFO
LegalZoom partners w/ businessloans.com


DIRECTORY