Renewal vs. Add on
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Results 1 to 16 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member Reputation points: 12452
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    351

    That's a bunch of crap. You can't say stacking is prominent because brokers are signing and agreeing to the terms of the contracts, later regretting their decision and deciding to use that as a reason behind stacking a deal. If that's the catalyst, the issue is on those brokers, not those funders.

    Now, that doesn't mean I don't agree with your position on those agreements being one-sided. With all of the reputable funders out there that do pay full commission on renewals and on the full contracted amount of a refi, I don't understand why a business owner would agree to sign one of these contracts saying that they would take a reduced commission. Its the same argument people make that small business owners should be intelligent enough to make those decisions when signing a cash advance contract.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Reputation points: 2893
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    283

    Quote Originally Posted by funding pro View Post
    That's a bunch of crap. You can't say stacking is prominent because brokers are signing and agreeing to the terms of the contracts, later regretting their decision and deciding to use that as a reason behind stacking a deal. If that's the catalyst, the issue is on those brokers, not those funders.

    Now, that doesn't mean I don't agree with your position on those agreements being one-sided. With all of the reputable funders out there that do pay full commission on renewals and on the full contracted amount of a refi, I don't understand why a business owner would agree to sign one of these contracts saying that they would take a reduced commission. Its the same argument people make that small business owners should be intelligent enough to make those decisions when signing a cash advance contract.
    I'm not saying it is the sole reason of stacking (greed is still the prominent one) but it adds to it. Calling it a catalyst isn't off the mark. Now I'd never regret signing an agreement like that, because I wouldn't do it in the first place. With that said, if there was an agreement in place already with my office and the Lender and I funded someone through them, I would have ZERO problem with sending them elsewhere come time for a REFI or a 2nd if the Merchant needed some extra capital. It just does not inspire loyalty at all, just the opposite. It is just bush league and sets up a borderline adversarial relationship.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-26-2022, 11:17 AM
  2. On Deck Renewal Commission Policy
    By Ditty in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-05-2014, 10:28 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-05-2012, 11:46 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

Blue Owl Capital acquires Atalaya
Kansas added to disclosure service tool
FIS launches SMB digital lending


DIRECTORY