Pearl vs Champion decision
Need a Funder or Vendor? START HERE

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Senior Member Reputation points: 13325 isaacdstern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,285

    Pearl vs Champion decision

    The appellate division, 1st Department has unanimously ruled that the transaction was not usurious!

    picture.jpg

  2. #2
    Senior Member Reputation points: 51665
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    657

    WooHoo! Go MCA companies and COJ's!

  3. #3
    Unreal how Shane Heskin gets beat over and over and over yet he will not stop trying

  4. #4
    Senior Member Reputation points: 13325 isaacdstern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,285

    Pearl vs Champion decision

    https://debanked.com/2018/03/its-settled-merchant-cash-advance-not-usurious/

  5. #5
    Senior Member Reputation points: 158630
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,202

    Quote Originally Posted by isaacdstern View Post
    https://debanked.com/2018/03/its-settled-merchant-cash-advance-not-usurious/
    This is huge news however you want to slice it. A much needed shot in the arm for non-bank SMB financing in general. Now let's see if everyone can keep their noses clean and continue to grow (up).

  6. #6
    Senior Member Reputation points: 11887 KINGCASH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    190

    You know- you can slice it any way you want. When a potential merchant is in need of funds; Whether it to turn it and make a quick profit on the funds, gap for receivables coming in or just to make payroll, most can't get it as quick as we can get it to them. Hats off to the judge understanding the merchant knowingly received the funds and thought they would use it against Pearl after the fact.

    I can't speak for all, but I'm here to help and get a sub 5 fico merchant or whatever the case may be the funds they need in order to continue on with their business.

    Great read.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Reputation points: 2496
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    187

    Quote Originally Posted by isaacdstern View Post
    The appellate division, 1st Department has unanimously ruled that the transaction was not usurious!

    picture.jpg
    Shout out to Berkovitch, Bouskila, and DLA Piper for securing the first appellate decision MCAs are not loans.
    David Obstfeld
    Chief Executive Officer
    SOS Capital
    1330 Ave of the Americas, NY, NY 10019
    212-235-5455
    SOSCapital.com

  8. #8
    Senior Member Reputation points: 218103
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,347

    This is a legal win that's is good for our industry.

    However, I hope that (for those of us that care) that an MCA is still is Ribis De'oraisa. Future GROSS is davar she'lo ba l'olam, so it can't be sold. It might be derabanan if it was on the future NET, but let's it's not, so let's not get into that.....

  9. #9
    Senior Member Reputation points: 218103
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,347

    For anyone out there that cares, I just got an email with an article / teshuva from Rav Marburger of Lakewood, who spent several hours looking over some contracts from various different funders out there and a broker, and had a long 2 hour conversation with him. For those with interest, and the ability to understand classic Jewish sources summarized in English, I'll be happy to forward it.

    For those who don't know, he's probably the current known biggest dayan out there who actually understands (and deals with) business transactions.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Reputation points: 5933
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    122

    Quote Originally Posted by abfunders View Post
    For anyone out there that cares, I just got an email with an article / teshuva from Rav Marburger of Lakewood, who spent several hours looking over some contracts from various different funders out there and a broker, and had a long 2 hour conversation with him. For those with interest, and the ability to understand classic Jewish sources summarized in English, I'll be happy to forward it.

    For those who don't know, he's probably the current known biggest dayan out there who actually understands (and deals with) business transactions.
    What does he say?
    Isaac N Mizrahi
    ISO Relations Manager | SPG Advance, LLC
    Office: 212-225-8279
    Mobile: 323-617-1397
    Email: Isaac@SPGAdvance.com
    www.SPGAdvance.com

  11. #11
    Senior Member Reputation points: 218103
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,347

    Quote Originally Posted by QuickFund View Post
    What does he say?
    That it depends on the contract's PG. Aggressive PGs are almost certainly ribis, but there are some contracts that are okay.
    That's not in the article, but that's what he told his congregant last night after reading several different contracts.
    Basically, it all depends on the recourse.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by abfunders View Post
    This is a legal win that's is good for our industry.

    However, I hope that (for those of us that care) that an MCA is still is Ribis De'oraisa. Future GROSS is davar she'lo ba l'olam, so it can't be sold. It might be derabanan if it was on the future NET, but let's it's not, so let's not get into that.....
    Its kinda hypocritical to be making such a post. If it bothers you so much you are always welcome to find another job.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Reputation points: 218103
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,347

    Quote Originally Posted by Keebler View Post
    Its kinda hypocritical to be making such a post. If it bothers you so much you are always welcome to find another job.
    I'm not sure who you think I'm funding..... who are your merchants?

  14. #14
    Senior Member Reputation points: 50201
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    353

    Quote Originally Posted by abfunders View Post
    I'm not sure who you think I'm funding..... who are your merchants?
    Who are your "Merchants" ? I dont see you in deals....

  15. #15
    Senior Member Reputation points: 218103
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3,347

    Quote Originally Posted by Cashman1 View Post
    Who are your "Merchants" ? I dont see you in deals....
    I didn't mean to start that game. I'm a broker, not a funder or lender. I'm a middleman for my merchants, which still makes a potential problem if both borrower and lender are Jewish. That's all I meant by "funding." Sorry for the confusion.

Similar Threads

  1. Why do we keep using Decision Logic
    By skideeppow in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-06-2017, 11:12 AM
  2. Decision one
    By MCAVeteran in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-20-2017, 02:41 PM
  3. Decision Logic
    By elklakebob in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-11-2016, 04:14 PM
  4. Decision Logic Feedback
    By MaxAdvance in forum Merchant Cash Advance
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-10-2014, 01:36 PM
  5. Qualities of a Champion
    By AVP Solutions in forum Payment Processing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-06-2014, 12:41 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


INDUSTRY ANNOUNCEMENTS

Lendica partners w/ EBizCharge
Pipe plans to fund $1B to SMBs
URBN partners with Stripe


DIRECTORY